2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Receiver Functions: Green's Function Estimation by Transdimensional Inversion and Its Application to OBS Data

Abstract: Receiver functions, calculated by deconvolving P (or vertical) component records of teleseismic waveforms from the corresponding SV (or radial) components, have been widely used to obtain receiver‐side Green's functions in an approximate form. Conventional receiver function methods, however, often fail due to numerical instability of the deconvolution and strong multiples on the P components. These problems become severe when analyzing in high frequency and using data from ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs). We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For geotechnical applications, such as the construction of offshore platforms and pipelines, these models provide constraints on the shear modulus (Ayres & Theilen, 2001) and allow quantifying sediment stability and earthquake amplification effects (Akal & Berkson, 2013; Sanchez‐Sesma, 1987). For seismic imaging, shear‐wave velocity models are required to improve the processing algorithms for multicomponent seismic data like static correction for converted PS waves (e.g., Muyzert, 2000), wavefield separation (e.g., Schalkwijk et al, 2000), or other imaging techniques with phase conversion (e.g., Akuhara et al, 2019). Also, combination of both S and P wave velocities helps to better interpret the lithology because together they are much more sensitive to fluid and gas contents than P wave alone (Ayres & Theilen, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For geotechnical applications, such as the construction of offshore platforms and pipelines, these models provide constraints on the shear modulus (Ayres & Theilen, 2001) and allow quantifying sediment stability and earthquake amplification effects (Akal & Berkson, 2013; Sanchez‐Sesma, 1987). For seismic imaging, shear‐wave velocity models are required to improve the processing algorithms for multicomponent seismic data like static correction for converted PS waves (e.g., Muyzert, 2000), wavefield separation (e.g., Schalkwijk et al, 2000), or other imaging techniques with phase conversion (e.g., Akuhara et al, 2019). Also, combination of both S and P wave velocities helps to better interpret the lithology because together they are much more sensitive to fluid and gas contents than P wave alone (Ayres & Theilen, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to intense water reverberations dominating the vertical component records. Recent efforts have overcome this difficulty and allowed for investigating subsurface structure using high-frequency receiver functions with data from offshore observatories (Akuhara et al, 2016(Akuhara et al, , 2017(Akuhara et al, , 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study performs the two-step teleseismic waveform inversion for stations from the seafloor cabled network (DONET1) deployed at the Kumano-nada (Kumano Sea) in the central Nankai subduction zone. First, we calculate high-frequency GFs using the multichannel deconvolution (MCD) method (Akuhara et al, 2019). Then, the GFs are inverted for the one-dimensional (1-D) seismic velocity structure beneath each station.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both surface wave and body wave (BW) data have been used in resolving sedimentary structures beneath seismic stations. For example, the amplitude ratio of Rayleigh wave recorded by the vertical and radial components, known as the Z/H ratio, is very sensitive to sedimentary structures (e.g., Boore & Toksöz, 1969) and has been used to invert for sedimentary structure (e.g., Lin et al, 2012, Li et al, 2016 teleseismic P waves are another type of data that are sensitive to the velocity jump at the sediment base and have been used to invert for sediment thickness and velocity (Akuhara et al, 2019;Bao & Niu, 2017). A recent study (Phạm & Tkalčić, 2017) suggests that autocorrelation of the teleseismic P wave coda is a promising technique for mapping shallow seismic boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%