2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond quadratic error: Case-study of a multiple criteria approach to the performance assessment of numerical forecasts of solar irradiance in the tropics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the end, forecasts would simply be the average of the satellite pictures, and all information about the cloud motions would be lost. A similar trade-off has been reported for deterministic settings when performance assessment relies in quadratic error measures (such as CRPS) [45]. Such metrics tend to favor smooth forecasts as to avoid large errors.…”
Section: Identification Of the Candidate Pixelssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the end, forecasts would simply be the average of the satellite pictures, and all information about the cloud motions would be lost. A similar trade-off has been reported for deterministic settings when performance assessment relies in quadratic error measures (such as CRPS) [45]. Such metrics tend to favor smooth forecasts as to avoid large errors.…”
Section: Identification Of the Candidate Pixelssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Refs. [90] , [91] , [92] proved that stepwise regression analysis (SRA) [93] is more efficient for variable selection than alternative methods. So, we adopt SRA to select variables.…”
Section: Application Using Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given modeling problem, useful variables must be separated from the unnecessary ones. SRA [93] defines predictor variables that most accurately characterize the variable to be predicted [112] . For this, we start by regressing the dependent variable on a single independent variable and set the significance level and values of (F-to-remove) and (F-to-enter) [112] ; F being the Fisher statistic.…”
Section: Stepwise Regression Analysis (Sra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 13 presents a Taylor diagram [47] with the overall CMF error for the PRS and the FRB COT forecasts as a function of the correlation coefficient, normalized RMSE and normalized standard deviation under all conditions and during TRN conditions. The use of this diagram was highlighted by numerous forecasting evaluation studies dealing with point-based comparisons as well as with image-based validation [48,49]. A note for this kind of analysis is that the PRS in some cases, like going from cloudy to clear sky conditions, presents better results than starting from clear sky to cloudy sky because returning to clear sky or CMF equals to one means that we go back to the optimum operating conditions for PRS, which are the clear sky conditions.…”
Section: Vs Prsmentioning
confidence: 99%