Beyond optimality: Multistakeholder robustness tradeoffs for regional water portfolio planning under deep uncertainty

Abstract

While optimality is a foundational mathematical concept in water resources planning and management, ''optimal'' solutions may be vulnerable to failure if deeply uncertain future conditions deviate from those assumed during optimization. These vulnerabilities may produce severely asymmetric impacts across a region, making it vital to evaluate the robustness of management strategies as well as their impacts for regional stakeholders. In this study, we contribute a multistakeholder many-objective robust decision making (MORDM) framework that blends many-objective search and uncertainty analysis tools to discover key tradeoffs between water supply alternatives and their robustness to deep uncertainties (e.g., population pressures, climate change, and financial risks). The proposed framework is demonstrated for four interconnected water utilities representing major stakeholders in the ''Research Triangle'' region of North Carolina, U.S. The utilities supply well over one million customers and have the ability to collectively manage drought via transfer agreements and shared infrastructure. We show that water portfolios for this region that compose optimal tradeoffs (i.e., Pareto-approximate solutions) under expected future conditions may suffer significantly degraded performance with only modest changes in deeply uncertain hydrologic and economic factors. We then use the Patient Rule Induction Method (PRIM) to identify which uncertain factors drive the individual and collective vulnerabilities for the four cooperating utilities. Our framework identifies key stakeholder dependencies and robustness tradeoffs associated with cooperative regional planning, which are critical to understanding the tensions between individual versus regional water supply goals. Cooperative demand management was found to be the key factor controlling the robustness of regional water supply planning, dominating other hydroclimatic and economic uncertainties through the 2025 planning horizon. Results suggest that a modest reduction in the projected rate of demand growth (from approximately 3% per year to 2.4%) will substantially improve the utilities' robustness to future uncertainty and reduce the potential for regional tensions. The proposed multistakeholder MORDM framework offers critical insights into the risks and challenges posed by rising water demands and hydrological uncertainties, providing a planning template for regions now forced to confront rapidly evolving water scarcity risks.

Dealing with deep uncertainties in landslide modelling for disaster risk reduction under climate change

“…Collins et al, 2012;Ning et al, 2012). As a result, one usually finds that the uncertainty in the final predicted impacts is also quite large and that a wide range of possible outcomes is feasible, which is of little practical use for decision-making or for identifying an "optimal" management solution (Bankes, 2002;Wilby and Dessai, 2010;Hallegatte et al, 2012;Herman et al, 2014). To reduce the range of possible outcomes, a smaller subset of the many possible potential future scenarios can be selected.…”

Modeling the decline of labor-sharing in the semi-desert region of Chile

“…The land is mostly classified as Bel secano,^which is defined by its low productivity, high susceptibility to erosion, and low carrying capacity for livestock. Most of the households in these communities do not have access to surface water for irrigation (Hearne and Donoso 2014). In consequence, the economic return is highly variable and strongly dependent on rainfall and ground water, forcing the farmers to rely on fast-cash rain-fed crops such as wheat.…”

“…Prospect theory (PT) introduces important aspects from cognitive psychology into more Btraditional^econometric models, including considerations of risk perception and risk attitude, which cause it to deviate from standard expected utility approaches (Wakker 2010). It describes in mathematical terms how people make decisions, not just by choosing among alternative options that involve probabilistic events but also by assuming that people make behavioral choices that are biased by the context, social or physical, to avoid losses or to seek gains (Hastie and Dawes 2010). The theory has been used to understand human decisions in multiple arenas to represent uncertain and ambiguous alternatives, such as international relationships (Goldgeier and Tetlock 2001), financial risk management (Fiegenbaum 1990), and insurance markets (Sydnor 2010), and it has been applied recently to problems related to natural resource management in variable environments (Podestá et al 2009).…”

Assumption-Simulation-Feedback-Adjustment (ASFA) Framework for Real-Time Correction of Water Resources Allocation: a Case Study of Longgang River Basin in Southern China

“…It considers that future condition represents a wide range of plausible states. The Boptimal^solution under one state would be suboptimal if the state changes (Bankes 2002;Herman et al 2014). Hence, RDM discusses the decision performance in a vast state of future scenarios and chooses a performance as a robust decision to face the future uncertainty (Steinschneider and Brown 2012;Herman et al 2014).…”

“…The Boptimal^solution under one state would be suboptimal if the state changes (Bankes 2002;Herman et al 2014). Hence, RDM discusses the decision performance in a vast state of future scenarios and chooses a performance as a robust decision to face the future uncertainty (Steinschneider and Brown 2012;Herman et al 2014). Groves and Lempert (2007) identified key scenarios which are most important to the decision makers and found such cases with statistical analysis to generate a robust long-term water planning in California.…”