2021
DOI: 10.1002/ets2.12332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Nuclear Families: Development of Inclusive Student Socioeconomic Status Survey Questions

Abstract: Social changes have resulted in an increase of students living in households that do not include both a mother and a father, reducing the efficacy of common survey questionnaire approaches to measuring student socioeconomic status (SES). This paper presents two studies conducted to develop and test a new, more inclusive set of student SES items appropriate for students from a range of household types. In the first study, we held group interviews with 57 students in Grades 4, 8, and 12 who lived in four nontrad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students reported on key demographics including age, parent/caregiver education as a proxy for socioeconomic status (Whorton et al, 2021; 1 = less than high school to 6 = graduate, medical, or professional school ; the student reported on both of parents/caregivers and the highest education attained was used for analysis; 33.3% had at least one parent/caregiver who had completed at least an undergraduate education), relationship to designated primary parent/caregiver (76.5% biological mother, 12.6% biological father), college attended (77.8% enrolled in 4‐year university), who they live with (32.9% currently living with their parent/caregiver), gender identity (which was dummy coded into male [22.7%] and other [4.1%], with female [70.8%] serving as the reference group), and race/ethnicity (recoded into White [34.2%; reference], Black [32.7%], Latinx [15.2%], and Other [17.6%, including: Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and so on, and biracial students due to small sample size of these groups]). Community college students were more likely to live with their parent/caregiver than 4‐year university students ( χ 2 (1) = 121.65, p < .001); however, there were no other significant differences on any of these demographic variables between community college and 4‐year university students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students reported on key demographics including age, parent/caregiver education as a proxy for socioeconomic status (Whorton et al, 2021; 1 = less than high school to 6 = graduate, medical, or professional school ; the student reported on both of parents/caregivers and the highest education attained was used for analysis; 33.3% had at least one parent/caregiver who had completed at least an undergraduate education), relationship to designated primary parent/caregiver (76.5% biological mother, 12.6% biological father), college attended (77.8% enrolled in 4‐year university), who they live with (32.9% currently living with their parent/caregiver), gender identity (which was dummy coded into male [22.7%] and other [4.1%], with female [70.8%] serving as the reference group), and race/ethnicity (recoded into White [34.2%; reference], Black [32.7%], Latinx [15.2%], and Other [17.6%, including: Asian, American Indian/Alaskan Native, and so on, and biracial students due to small sample size of these groups]). Community college students were more likely to live with their parent/caregiver than 4‐year university students ( χ 2 (1) = 121.65, p < .001); however, there were no other significant differences on any of these demographic variables between community college and 4‐year university students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%