Beyond modules and hubs: the potential of gene coexpression networks for investigating molecular mechanisms of complex brain disorders

Abstract

In a research environment dominated by reductionist approaches to brain disease mechanisms, gene network analysis provides a complementary framework in which to tackle the complex dysregulations that occur in neuropsychiatric and other neurological disorders. Gene-gene expression correlations are a common source of molecular networks because they can be extracted from high-dimensional disease data and encapsulate the activity of multiple regulatory systems. However, the analysis of gene coexpression patterns is often treated as a mechanistic black box, in which looming “hub genes” direct cellular networks, and where other features are obscured. By examining the biophysical bases of coexpression and gene regulatory changes that occur in disease, recent studies suggest it is possible to use coexpression networks as a multi-omic screening procedure to generate novel hypotheses for disease mechanisms. Because technical processing steps can affect the outcome and interpretation of coexpression networks, we examine the assumptions and alternatives to common patterns of coexpression analysis and discuss additional topics such as acceptable datasets for coexpression analysis, the robust identification of modules, disease-related prioritization of genes and molecular systems and network meta-analysis. To accelerate coexpression research beyond modules and hubs, we highlight some emerging directions for coexpression network research that are especially relevant to complex brain disease, including the centrality-lethality relationship, integration with machine learning approaches and network pharmacology.

An Integrative Genomic Study Implicates the Postsynaptic Density in the Pathogenesis of Bipolar Disorder

“…At β = 12, networks created by WGNCA showed 475% scale free topology in both datasets, so a value of 12 was used in this study. We used biweight correlation instead of the default Pearson correlation, because it is robust and resistant to outliers (Gaiteri et al, 2014). WGCNA identifies co-expressed genes and puts them into networks or modules.…”

Sex-Specific Effects of Stress on Mood-Related Gene Expression

“…However, this provides an incomplete picture, and looking at how pathways are affected across regions may be more informative in the understanding of the disease at the network and circuit level [11, 12]. By investigating stress-induced transcriptional changes across major nodes of a circuit, it may be possible to gain a greater insight into how these molecular pathways are affected in disease.…”

Upregulated Glucose Metabolism Correlates Inversely with CD8+ T-cell Infiltration and Survival in Squamous Cell Carcinoma

“…Network analysis enables extraction of cell type-specific information from whole tissue while providing a system-level view and giving some insight into the communication between tumor, stroma, and the host immune response. The power of WGCNA in capturing a systems perspective is built upon its underlying algorithm, which takes into account not only the correlation of two genes with each other but also the degree of similarity between a pair of genes in their correlation structure within the rest of the network (11). This strategy, applied to the analysis of SCC, identified inverse correlates of TIL infiltration that are associated with the natural evolution of cancer, encompassing genomic alterations and dysregulated signaling pathways that culminate in stabilization of HIF and elevated tumor glycolysis.…”