Beyond medical humanitarianism - Politics and humanitarianism in the figure of the Mīdānī physician

Abstract

This article explores the complex position of local physicians at times of political unrest or conflict, conceptualizing local medical voluntarism as a form of collective action. It analyzes the evolving interpretation of medical neutrality among Egyptian physicians who provided medical assistance to injured protesters in the Egyptian uprising (2011-2013). In-depth interviews with 24 medical and non-medical volunteers on their perception of medical neutrality were matched with their mobilization and participation history, showing the extent towards which political considerations influenced their voluntary medical engagement. The results firstly show that revolutionary political considerations played a central role in the physicians' mobilization into medical networks active in the protests, as well as in their interpretation of their medical and non-medical activities. Secondly, I argue that the interpretation of medical neutrality among Egyptian physicians evolved significantly over time. A special type of medical volunteer took shape, the mīdānī physician. This physician openly expresses his/her political convictions and adheres to (self-defined) humanitarian principles through a conscious reconciliation of the two. The article details the increasing difficulty of this task after the revolutionary movement splintered into competing factions and citizens ended up fighting each other instead of authoritarian rule.

Localisation in the balance: Syrian medical‐humanitarian NGOs' strategic engagement with the local and international

“…Local health actors' engagement in the conflict first occurred in the form of networks of local, befriended HCWs, where ‘relational connectedness’ of friends and family trumped ‘collective connectedness’ of association with a group, like the medical profession, presumably due to the security risks (Brubaker and Cooper, 2000, p. 20; Hawkley, Browne, and Cacioppo, 2005, p. 801) 6 . The Syrian revolutionary experience further galvanised the creation and strengthening of ties, as people came together in high‐risk environments, such as protests and secret clinics, where bonds were forged, and trust, a common purpose, and solidarity were further developed over time—for a similar process among medical volunteers during the Egyptian uprising, see Roborgh (2018).…”

Deaths, Borders, and the Exception: Humanitarianism at the Spanish–Moroccan Border

“…Humanitarianism has a deep and challenging relation to the exceptional. Scholars do not agree on a univocal definition of humanitarianism (Roborgh, 2018; Ticktin, 2014), but this can broadly be defined as a series of policies, discourses, and practices aiming at relieving suffering and protecting life, triggered by contrasting feelings of compassion and solidarity inscribed in a shared, universal conception of “human” (Fassin, 2007, 2011a; Feldman & Ticktin, 2010; Ticktin, 2011). Although suffering can be found in multiple and variegated sites, the life on which most humanitarian organizations focus “is not an ordinary one, in the sense of being burdened by everyday complaints,” but it is “the life located in an exceptional state of risk” (Redfield, 2013, p. 33).…”

Improving the communication ethics of dental students through learning about local culture

“…Medical decisions made by doctors for their patients must be conveyed through positive, practical, constructive, and respectful communication skills (Borysowski et al, 2021;Koh, 2018;Søndergaard et al, 2021). Humanist doctors have an advantage in that they can apply principles of communication (Grech, 2020;Roborgh, 2018). Medical professionals must establish good interpersonal relationships (Al-Hemiary et al, 2020;Armas et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2021).…”