Beyond Liberal Peace: Religious Violence and Tactical Peacebuilding in Indonesia

Abstract

Since the downfall of Suharto’s authoritarian government in 1998, Indonesia has witnessed a variety of violent conflicts, intergroup tensions and Islamist radicalism, which in turn pose threats to the country’s security, safety and peace. This article examines various forms of religious violence, particularly Islamist violence, and ways of overcoming them tactically or strategically in post-Suharto Indonesia. This article underscores the need to go beyond the liberal peace framework, underlines the significance of the implementation of tactical peacebuilding and highlights the central roles of domestic religious actors in the peace and reconciliation processes. This article suggests that tactical peacebuilding requires multiple approaches that utilise various sources, including religion and culture, and needs a strategic collaboration among manifold actors—religious and secular, state and society, domestic and foreign. The Indonesian case shows that religion is not only a source of conflict, violence and ‘violence-building’ but also a useful resource for reconciliation, conflict resolution and peacebuilding.

Dialectics of Tradition and Modernity in the Architectural Landscape of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

“…It is important to note that radical Islam is not representative of the majority of Muslims who practice moderate Islam, and apply the pure teachings of Islam, promote peace, foster tolerance, and live together with groups that have religions outside Islam (Jamilah, 2021;Mamahit, 2021). Moderate Muslims themselves reject violence as a means to achieve political goals and support democratic values and pluralism (Cesari, 2021;Al Qurtuby, 2023).…”

Validation of the General Evaluation Scale for Measuring Ethnic and Religious Prejudice in an Indonesian Sample

“…Ethnoreligious identities play a crucial role in Indonesian society, as sentiments based on ethnoreligious identities have become the primary sources of social and political conflicts (Harsono 2019;Al Qurtuby 2023). As an example, during the 2017 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election, the socio-political circumstances was manipulated to influence religious and ethnic sentiments for political gain of certain parties (Sumaktoyo 2021).…”

“…Scholars such as Al Qurtuby (2023) and Harsono (2019) underscore the significance of ethnoreligious identities in shaping the societal landscape, emphasizing ethnoreligious identities' pivotal role in contributing to social and political tensions and conflicts in Indonesia. Given that Indonesia is a country that is so ethnically and religiously complex, socio-political as contextual factors of intergroup relations (Guimond et al 2014) can contribute to varied experiences of ethnoreligious relations within different communities in Indonesia.…”