2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond labeled lines: A population coding account of the thermal grill illusion

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Population coding, in which sensory quality depends on a balance of activity across many different afferents, potentially differing in physiological type as well as in location, may play a crucial role in robust and stable thermosensation. 49 In the thermal system, spatial summation is a well-known feature in both object-level perception and in thermoregulation. 50,51 In our study, we use small probes to study thermosensation in its role during object-level perception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Population coding, in which sensory quality depends on a balance of activity across many different afferents, potentially differing in physiological type as well as in location, may play a crucial role in robust and stable thermosensation. 49 In the thermal system, spatial summation is a well-known feature in both object-level perception and in thermoregulation. 50,51 In our study, we use small probes to study thermosensation in its role during object-level perception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that these interlaced bars are suitably arranged, and their temperature differs by a sufficiently large margin (roughly ≥20°C), bars whose independent application is perceived as painless are collectively perceived as producing a painful burning sensation (Alrutz, 1898; Thunberg, 1896). While there is disagreement as to why this should be, candidate accounts suggest that it involves pain processing making a kind of (inferential) error about the nature, source or significance of the sensory stimulation it receives as input (Fardo et al, 2020). Yet what is known or believed by the organism seems to have no clear effect on the underlying systems' assessment of the situation.…”
Section: Modularity As the Default Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, onset of acute pain is frequently delayed by minutes, if not days (Melzack et al, 1982; Wall, 1979), while pain following a stroke or spinal cord injury can take years to set in (Schott, 2001). Even pain onset in the TGI is typically delayed by several seconds (Fardo et al, 2020). Consequently, one's cognitive assessment of an injury (or lack thereof) often precedes pain onset by a significant margin.…”
Section: Modularity As the Default Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major theories on the development of the TGI have been suggested: the "addition or convergence theory" and "disinhibition or unmasking theory" [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: The Underlining Mechanisms Of the Tgimentioning
confidence: 99%