2015
DOI: 10.1111/nejo.12078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Instrumentalism: A Relational Approach to Negotiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary mechanisms provided in the literature to explain the underlying benefits of communicating perspective is that it fosters a greater sense of ‘feeling heard’, and mutual understanding (Ames, 2008; Ames & Wazlawek, 2014; Bruneau & Saxe, 2012; Howieson & Priddis, 2011; Lee et al, 2015). It also fosters a sense of openness, transparency, and honesty that maximises perceived politeness and minimises perceived hostility (Howieson & Priddis, 2015; Ingerson, DeTienne & Liljenquist, 2015; Kellas, Willer & Trees, 2013; Kidder, 2017; Seehausen et al, 2012). The primary mechanisms to explain a benefit of I-language over you-language are that I-language indicates a recognition of providing a specific point of view that is open for discussion (Burr, 1990), and that you-language can at times be perceived as accusatory (Kubany et al, 1992a, 1992b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary mechanisms provided in the literature to explain the underlying benefits of communicating perspective is that it fosters a greater sense of ‘feeling heard’, and mutual understanding (Ames, 2008; Ames & Wazlawek, 2014; Bruneau & Saxe, 2012; Howieson & Priddis, 2011; Lee et al, 2015). It also fosters a sense of openness, transparency, and honesty that maximises perceived politeness and minimises perceived hostility (Howieson & Priddis, 2015; Ingerson, DeTienne & Liljenquist, 2015; Kellas, Willer & Trees, 2013; Kidder, 2017; Seehausen et al, 2012). The primary mechanisms to explain a benefit of I-language over you-language are that I-language indicates a recognition of providing a specific point of view that is open for discussion (Burr, 1990), and that you-language can at times be perceived as accusatory (Kubany et al, 1992a, 1992b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An understanding of perspectives facilitates a more integrative approach where parties are willing to compromise to arrive at a mutually beneficial solution (Galinksy et al, 2008; Kemp & Smith, 1994; Todd & Galinsky, 2014). Therefore, in dispute resolution a mediator will endeavour to encourage perspective taking by both parties (Howieson & Priddis, 2012, 2015; Ingerson, DeTienne & Liljenquist, 2015; Kidder, 2017; Lee et al, 2015). However, fostering perspective taking is more involved than simply telling someone to try and consider the other person’s point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perspective taking is a necessary part of social competence, which leads to better relationship management and improved collaboration (Goleman, Boyatzis, and McGee 2002). Perspective taking can enhance relational negotiating (Ingerson, DeTienne, and Liljenquist 2015). Students who experientially learn about their negotiating partners feel more positive about their relationships (Gehlbach et al 2015).…”
Section: Perspective Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the study demonstrates how I-language becomes more beneficial for minimising hostility when one also communicates perspective (e.g., 'Lucy, I understand Manuscript to be reviewed understanding (Ames, 2008;Ames & Wazlawek, 2014;Bruneau & Saxe, 2012;Howieson & Priddis, 2011;Lee et al, 2015). It also fosters a sense of openness, transparency, and honesty that maximises perceived politeness and minimises perceived hostility (Howieson & Priddis, 2015;Ingerson et al, 2015;Kellas et al, 2013;Kidder, 2017;Seehausen et al, 2012). The primary mechanisms to explain a benefit of I-language over you-language are that I-language indicates a recognition of providing a specific point of view that is open for discussion (Burr, 1990), and that you-language can at times be perceived as accusatory (Kubany et al, 1992a(Kubany et al, , 1992b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%