2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2015.468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Gauss: Image-Set Matching on the Riemannian Manifold of PDFs

Abstract: State-of-the-art image-set matching techniques typically implicitly model each image-set with a Gaussian distribution. Here, we propose to go beyond these representations and model imagesets as probability distribution functions (PDFs) using kernel density estimators. To compare and match image-sets, we exploit Csiszár f -divergences, which bear strong connections to the geodesic distance defined on the space of PDFs, i.e., the statistical manifold. Furthermore, we introduce valid positive definite kernels on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Wang et al [44] represented image sets with the more flexible Gaussian mixture models (GMM) and proposed discriminant analysis on the Riemannian manifold of Gaussian distributions for classification. Harandi et al [9] modelled the set structure with probability distribution functions (PDFs) via kernel density estimation. The models are then matched using the Csiszar f-divergences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Wang et al [44] represented image sets with the more flexible Gaussian mixture models (GMM) and proposed discriminant analysis on the Riemannian manifold of Gaussian distributions for classification. Harandi et al [9] modelled the set structure with probability distribution functions (PDFs) via kernel density estimation. The models are then matched using the Csiszar f-divergences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, image set classification has provided a new direction to address this task. In this paper, we report the classification performance of our method on the MDSD [37], [56] dataset. This dataset is comprised of 13 different categories of dynamic scenes with each has 10 video sequences.…”
Section: E Dynamic Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate the PDF on the manifold of SPD matrices, we can map them to the tangent space and transform them into vectors. Since KDE may produce less reliable and very sparse PDFs [22], we can learn a lowdimensional representation of these vectors through PCA. However, this solution is inconsistent with the aim of performing discriminative manifold-to-manifold dimensionality reduction for SPD matrices.…”
Section: B Affinity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original-sized color images are used as the input to CNN and the dimensionality of the CNN output is reduced by PCA to 400. Following the same settings as in [22], we adopt a seventy-thirty-ratio (STR) protocol which randomly selects 7 videos for training and the remaining 3 videos for testing. We set m = 40 and λ b = 7 on this dataset.…”
Section: E Scene Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%