2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: Networks for knowledge exchange in the English land management advisory system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
92
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(171 reference statements)
3
92
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides advisors, farmers use different sources of information and support, such as media and peers, which often rank above advisors as most used sources (Gielen, Hoeve, and Nieuwenhuis 2003;Solano et al 2003;Oreszczyn, Lane, and Carr 2010;Lubell, Niles, and Hoffman 2014). As several authors argue, farmers are often surrounded by networks of different complementary advisors (Klerkx and Proctor 2013;Phillipson et al 2016), who also sometimes jointly offer integrated advice on complex issues that have several dimensions (e.g. technical, economic).…”
Section: Diversity Regarding Who Is Supplying Agricultural Advisory Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides advisors, farmers use different sources of information and support, such as media and peers, which often rank above advisors as most used sources (Gielen, Hoeve, and Nieuwenhuis 2003;Solano et al 2003;Oreszczyn, Lane, and Carr 2010;Lubell, Niles, and Hoffman 2014). As several authors argue, farmers are often surrounded by networks of different complementary advisors (Klerkx and Proctor 2013;Phillipson et al 2016), who also sometimes jointly offer integrated advice on complex issues that have several dimensions (e.g. technical, economic).…”
Section: Diversity Regarding Who Is Supplying Agricultural Advisory Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results confirm the existence of several farmer-advisor relationships, depending on the farmer's position, information-seeking style, and capability, resembling Ingram's (2008) earlier findings. Sometimes, a good demand-supply match occurs, but, if this does not happen, arrangements are put in place to mitigate such systemic weaknesses, that is, installation of advisory system coordination and capacity building, as described by Klerkx and Proctor (2013). Beyond confirming that findings from earlier work on farmer-advisor interactions in pluralistic systems are also found in the Norwegian case, there is an important emergent finding of specific configurations of farmers and advisors in the Norwegian advisory system (following earlier ideas of Phillipson et al 2016) in response to farmers' dynamic demands (Kilelu, Klerkx, and Leeuwis 2014).…”
Section: Public Goals As a Factor For Targeting Various Farmer Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intermediary organizations that link various actors are recognized as key supporters of innovation (Klerkx & Gildemacher, 2012). Howells (2006) defines an intermediary as 'an organization of body that acts as an agent or broker in any aspect of the innovation process between two or more parties.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members interact with other members at cooperative training events, lectures and field days and strengthen bonding social capital. They also interact more regularly with cooperative administration, building trust which facilitates employing new agricultural practices (Klerkx & Proctor, 2013).…”
Section: Increased Human and Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%