2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-019-09956-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond first grade: examining word, sentence, and discourse text factors associated with oral reading rate in informational text in second grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, problems with decoding may be reflected in poor processing on a sentence level, although contextual information could compensate for insufficient decoding skills. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that contextual information was predictive of oral reading rate in second grade children (Tortorelli, 2020) and that text higher text complexity was associated with reading errors in 9-15 years old children (Nguyen et al, 2020). The way language comprehension and text decoding are related differs between languages (Koda, 2007).…”
Section: Individual Differences In L2 Wti and Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In other words, problems with decoding may be reflected in poor processing on a sentence level, although contextual information could compensate for insufficient decoding skills. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that contextual information was predictive of oral reading rate in second grade children (Tortorelli, 2020) and that text higher text complexity was associated with reading errors in 9-15 years old children (Nguyen et al, 2020). The way language comprehension and text decoding are related differs between languages (Koda, 2007).…”
Section: Individual Differences In L2 Wti and Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Whereas a vast literature exists on how reader characteristics impact reading comprehension, comparatively fewer studies have examined the influence of text‐based features on reading comprehension outcomes above and beyond person‐level characteristics. Notably, most of these investigations have focused on adolescent (e.g., Barth, Tolar, Fletcher, & Francis, 2014; Kulesz, Francis, Barnes, & Fletcher, 2016) or adult populations (e.g., Follmer & Sperling, 2018); only two known studies to date (McNamara, Ozuru, & Floyd, 2011; Tortorelli, 2020) have investigated the interactions between SVR‐based reader characteristics and text characteristics in elementary‐age students. This is crucial because there are significant developmental shifts in the predictive associations between reader characteristics and reading outcomes in elementary school (e.g., decoding ability is particularly important for young readers; García & Cain, 2014).…”
Section: Theories Of Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of studies focusing on elementary‐age readers, Tortorelli (2020) discovered, in a sample of 5,133 second‐grade students, that oral reading rate was influenced by discourse theory text variables, after controlling for isolated word reading and English learner status. Specifically, word concreteness and referential cohesion were positively associated, whereas deep cohesion was negatively associated, with oral reading rate (Tortorelli, 2020). Similarly, McNamara et al (2011) studied the impacts of cohesion and genre on reading comprehension in a sample of 65 fourth graders.…”
Section: Theories Of Reading Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have also proposed new text analysis methods based on Coh-Metrix tools (Wolfe et al, 2019) or developed new application platforms (Shi et al, 2018;McNamara et al, 2013). In addition, relevant researchers have carried out some research on the measurement of text readability and complexity (Tortorelli, 2020;Spencer et al, 2019), which also provides some valuable guidance and reference for the selection of method in this paper.…”
Section: Coh-metrix Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%