2021
DOI: 10.37718/csa.2021.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Entanglement

Abstract: This keynote discusses how human-animal relationships can be studied as entanglements to understand more of the situatedness of human and animal bodies and lives. It provides a selection of thinking tools from critical posthumanist feminism and new materialism which should prove useful for studying more-than-human worldmaking through archaeology. These tools can be used to study how humanity and animality are produced, how to recognise animal agentiality, and to highlight challenges on the way. Key issues are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Armstrong Oma and Goldhahn, 2020;Brusgaard et al, 2019;Harris and Cipolla, 2017;Hill, 2013;Hussain, 2019;Løvschal, 2022;Mannermaa, 2013;Marciniak, 2020;Oma Armstrong, 2018;Overton, 2016;Russell, 2012;Sykes, 2015). Just as animal historians have proposed to employ a dedicated 'animal lens' (Specht, 2016) to disclose new perspectives, insights and understandings of the past, multispecies archaeologists are now beginning to draw attention to the often-underestimated involvement of animal others in the making of prehistory (Fredengren, 2021;Hamilakis and Overton, 2013;Kost and Hussain, 2019;Pilaar, 2017). As Eitler (2014) reminds us, however, the role of animals cannot simply be cast as invariant and hence as a priori given -that is, as a mere consequence of supposedly essential species-level qualities (see also Haraway, 2003;Howell, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Armstrong Oma and Goldhahn, 2020;Brusgaard et al, 2019;Harris and Cipolla, 2017;Hill, 2013;Hussain, 2019;Løvschal, 2022;Mannermaa, 2013;Marciniak, 2020;Oma Armstrong, 2018;Overton, 2016;Russell, 2012;Sykes, 2015). Just as animal historians have proposed to employ a dedicated 'animal lens' (Specht, 2016) to disclose new perspectives, insights and understandings of the past, multispecies archaeologists are now beginning to draw attention to the often-underestimated involvement of animal others in the making of prehistory (Fredengren, 2021;Hamilakis and Overton, 2013;Kost and Hussain, 2019;Pilaar, 2017). As Eitler (2014) reminds us, however, the role of animals cannot simply be cast as invariant and hence as a priori given -that is, as a mere consequence of supposedly essential species-level qualities (see also Haraway, 2003;Howell, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is encouraging to find several recent contributions built on different outlines of materiality and practice studies. This is also the reason why they are fruitful and, not least, more operative in further analyses of intersections (e.g., Conneller, 2011; Fowler, 2013; Conkey, 2017; Fredengren, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%