Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Deficit Models of Learning Mathematics: Socio-cultural Directions for Change and Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such cognitive studies continue to exist as an established tradition within mathematics education while minimally accounting for the sociopolitical contexts of mathematical thinking and learning. As part of their concluding remarks in their review of the research in mathematics education, Frade et al (2013) asked the following question:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such cognitive studies continue to exist as an established tradition within mathematics education while minimally accounting for the sociopolitical contexts of mathematical thinking and learning. As part of their concluding remarks in their review of the research in mathematics education, Frade et al (2013) asked the following question:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current chapter builds on other reviews that have discussed the intersections between equity and mathematical thinking and learning. The reviews include Frade, Acioly-Régnier, and Jun (2013) in The Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education and Nasir, Hand, and Taylor's (2008) Review of Research in Education chapter on "Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries Between 'Cultural' and 'Domain' Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom and Beyond." The selection of the research programs and the particular studies in this chapter was guided by the focus on the politics of mathematical thinking and learning.…”
Section: Focus and Criteria For The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La manera como distintos aspectos de la educación matemática crean ventajas y desventajas para distintos grupos sociales se convirtió en un asunto de acceso equitativo a la educación y a los beneficios sociales, económicos y culturales asociados (Jablonka, 2009). La discusión sobre quiénes son aquellos que fracasan sistemática-mente se ha dejado de entender netamente como un asunto de deficiencia cognitiva individual (Frade, Acioly-Régnier, y Jun, 2013). Gran parte de la investigación sobre desarrollo cognitivo en matemáticas hasta ese momento se basaba principalmente en la visión ontogenética piagetiana.…”
Section: Desigualdades Y Educación Matemáticaunclassified
“…[16] This, in turn, legitimizes a small group of students while marginalizing others who have a wealth of other assets that are not leveraged in math class. [27][28][29][30] Again, the marginalization is a function of how courses are organized, and should not be seen as deficits in individual students' cognitive states. More inclusive mathematics courses are student-centered [31,32] and they position students as epistemic and historical agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%