2011
DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e328349cfab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond conventional endoscopic ultrasound

Abstract: Despite its advantages in assessing the organs situated near the gastrointestinal tract, EUS is still an operator-dependent technique. The new EUS examination modalities incorporated in modern ultrasound systems allow a highly accurate diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among various imaging modalities, EUS is gaining popularity for: accurately judging deep tumors; EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration, which obtains biopsies of affected tissue by extracting a small number of cells with a very fine needle and has a high diagnostic accuracy (92%) [28]; the ability to detect pancreatic lesions and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms <1 cm with a sensitivity greater than that of transabdominal US, CT scan or MRI; and improved sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastasis and vascular infiltration as compared with CT imaging. Further advancement in EUS, including contrast-enhanced EUS (for improved characterization of vessels in the desired lesions, improved differential diagnosis and accurate staging or follow-up of tumor), EUS elastography (for real-time evaluation of tissue stiffness) and hybrid imaging (CT/US, CT/US/MRI) can potentially help improve detection and characterization of focal lesions [29]. In addition to EUS, other imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI and MRCP, are being used either in combination with each other or alongside EUS for screening asymptomatic high-risk cases of PC (discussed in the previous section).…”
Section: Screening Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among various imaging modalities, EUS is gaining popularity for: accurately judging deep tumors; EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration, which obtains biopsies of affected tissue by extracting a small number of cells with a very fine needle and has a high diagnostic accuracy (92%) [28]; the ability to detect pancreatic lesions and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms <1 cm with a sensitivity greater than that of transabdominal US, CT scan or MRI; and improved sensitivity in detecting lymph node metastasis and vascular infiltration as compared with CT imaging. Further advancement in EUS, including contrast-enhanced EUS (for improved characterization of vessels in the desired lesions, improved differential diagnosis and accurate staging or follow-up of tumor), EUS elastography (for real-time evaluation of tissue stiffness) and hybrid imaging (CT/US, CT/US/MRI) can potentially help improve detection and characterization of focal lesions [29]. In addition to EUS, other imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI and MRCP, are being used either in combination with each other or alongside EUS for screening asymptomatic high-risk cases of PC (discussed in the previous section).…”
Section: Screening Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the accuracy of the method for discriminating of liver lesions [5154] and similarly good results for the discrimination of pancreatic lesions [5558] in percutaneous ultrasound, there was hope that the method could increase the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound for the discrimination of chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma even further (see Figure 3). Initial experiences showed a reliable display of microvessel perfusions down to a size of a single contrast enhancer bubble [5961]. However, Doppler analysis in combination with this method is not available so far and this makes the differentiation of arterial and venous microvessels impossible.…”
Section: Perfusion Studies Using Contrast-enhanced Low Mechanical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique, the real-time visualization of the calculated strain value can provide information on tissue hardness at the area of interest and the distribution pattern of tissue hardness as well. In addition to EUS image, these information can guide to select the most probable malignant lymph node to approach for EUS-FNA 15,16…”
Section: Advancement Of Techniques In Eusmentioning
confidence: 99%