2014 11th Annual Conference on Wireless on-Demand Network Systems and Services (WONS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/wons.2014.6814723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond contact predictions in mobile opportunistic networks

Abstract: Abstract-When studying and designing protocols for mobile opportunistic networks, most works consider only direct contact patterns between mobile nodes. Tracking these contacts is important for end-to-end communications but relying only on this kind of information provides a limited view about transmission possibilities. Mobile users are often in intercontact, but still separated by only a few hops, which translate into effective communication opportunities between nodes. In this paper, we focus on such a type… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] suggests that monitoring a node's vicinity up to four hops improves network performance while monitoring overhead is low. Subsequently, [37] studies the predictability of multi-hop opportunities in DTNs. The performance of non-sparse wireless networks has been studied from a percolation theory perspective in [16], [17], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] suggests that monitoring a node's vicinity up to four hops improves network performance while monitoring overhead is low. Subsequently, [37] studies the predictability of multi-hop opportunities in DTNs. The performance of non-sparse wireless networks has been studied from a percolation theory perspective in [16], [17], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as pointed out by Conan et al [106] and Passarella et al [107], these results focus on aggregate inter-contact distributions, and are not representative of the network behavior, which instead depends on the properties of individual pairs. An interesting addition to the standard contact and inter-contact analysis is proposed by Tatar et al, which consider in their model an extended notion of contact relationships [108].…”
Section: Delayed Offloadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why, we inspired from the results on κ-vicinity from [12] to extend the simple FREAK solution [13] in a mechanism which would take benefit from multi-hop contacts. With this solution, that we named multi-level FREAK (ML-FREAK) DTN, we should be able to decrease problems like described earlier, that might occur in some networks.…”
Section: Where the Multi-level Freak Comes Frommentioning
confidence: 99%