2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond ConCA: Rethinking causality and construction accidents

Abstract: The construction industry takes an orthodox approach to safety: Finding root causes, quantifying risk, and often blaming frontline workers. However, safety has reached a plateau and the limitations of this approach are starting to be acknowledged. A sociotechnical systems approach (as applied in the ConCA model) presents new opportunities to understand accident causation by linking immediate accident circumstances with the distal shaping and originating influences. 32 construction safety managers, consultants,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along the same lines, Giorgi et al [24] considered that managers have to develop mechanisms for the detection and the supervision of the psychological health of their workers and specifically the stress that they undergo for the improvement of the conditions that cause it. In the study carried out by [25], the results support when risk management takes into account the psychosocial aspect of workers. There is also evidence that there has been collaboration with workers to demonstrate that they are valued, among other factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Along the same lines, Giorgi et al [24] considered that managers have to develop mechanisms for the detection and the supervision of the psychological health of their workers and specifically the stress that they undergo for the improvement of the conditions that cause it. In the study carried out by [25], the results support when risk management takes into account the psychosocial aspect of workers. There is also evidence that there has been collaboration with workers to demonstrate that they are valued, among other factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A means of suppressing or overriding information 9 5 No means of conveying spatial or functional information to human operator 9 6 Poor system/human-user interface 8 7 No obvious means of reversing an unintended action 8 8…”
Section: Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the combination of the following aspects, such as frequent employee turnover, subcontracting and stringent contract deadlines, outdoor work in all weather conditions, lack of highly trained workers, use of obsolete working equipment, frequent change of work sites, as well as the presence of different companies on the same site contemporaneously contributes to the high rate of accidents and injuries [5]. Consequently, analysis of accident causality and the definition of the related measures for safety management represent a complex task [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical barriers are sometimes difficult to assemble and disassemble in dynamic environments with daily changes, and they may fail [ 42 ]. Safety procedures, on the other hand, can be poorly designed or insensitive, and frequently they are not updated according to the changing environments of construction sites [ 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%