2018
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond compliance: An approach to serving English language learners with disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, AP John asserted a hierarchy between the entitlements attached to Title III and IDEA—special education trumped bilingual education, a belief found in prior research about the support of dual-identified students in both English-dominant and bilingual schools (Kangas, 2014, 2017). With little guidance, educators creatively navigate the demands of two disjointed policies (Stinson, 2018), which often results in dual-identified students lacking access to bilingual education (Martínez-Álvarez, 2019). Educators who specialize in special education, such as AP John, have been found to counsel dual-identified students out of bilingual services, not only because of the perception that an IEP trumps entitlements to bilingual education but also because of the belief that SWDs cannot handle learning in two languages (Martínez-Álvarez, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, AP John asserted a hierarchy between the entitlements attached to Title III and IDEA—special education trumped bilingual education, a belief found in prior research about the support of dual-identified students in both English-dominant and bilingual schools (Kangas, 2014, 2017). With little guidance, educators creatively navigate the demands of two disjointed policies (Stinson, 2018), which often results in dual-identified students lacking access to bilingual education (Martínez-Álvarez, 2019). Educators who specialize in special education, such as AP John, have been found to counsel dual-identified students out of bilingual services, not only because of the perception that an IEP trumps entitlements to bilingual education but also because of the belief that SWDs cannot handle learning in two languages (Martínez-Álvarez, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, predominantly white and/or monolingual educators’ and therapists’ misunderstandings and biases related to language function for students with disabilities have resulted in the exclusion of students with disabilities from linguistically affirming education spaces and related service experiences (Cioè‑Peña, 2020; Lim, O’Reilly, Sigafoos, O’Reilly, Sigafoos, Ledbetter‐Cho, & Lancioni, 2018). Likewise, English language teachers’ uncritical and unsupported engagement with policy and professional learning around race and whiteness contributes to the unwarranted subjection of multilingual students to the special education referral process (Migliarini & Stinson, 2020), insufficient provision of disability‐ and/or language‐related services (Kangas, 2017; Stinson, 2018), and the disproportionate representation through under‐ and over‐identification of multilingual children in special education (Artiles, 2013; Artiles, Rueda, Salazar, & Higareda, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%