2015
DOI: 10.1111/jcom.12151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attribution of responsibility is a common dependent variable in studies of framing; jumpstarted by the pioneering work by Iyengar (1990Iyengar ( , 1991, recent years have seen a plethora of studies examining attribution of responsibility in the context of framing (e.g. Chang et al, 2016;Kühne et al, 2015;Springer and Harwood, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attribution of responsibility is a common dependent variable in studies of framing; jumpstarted by the pioneering work by Iyengar (1990Iyengar ( , 1991, recent years have seen a plethora of studies examining attribution of responsibility in the context of framing (e.g. Chang et al, 2016;Kühne et al, 2015;Springer and Harwood, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking again at the emotional framing literature, Kühne and Schemer (2015) showed that anger frames lead to a support of harsh political decisions as well as political participation in their implementation. A further study of Kühne, Weber and Sommer (2015) showed that high levels of anger lead to a support of punitive measure in case of youth violence. Moreover, perceived anger also leads to a greater willingness to engage in politics in general (Weber, 2013).…”
Section: Effects Of Anger On Political Persuasionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Weiner [48], who developed attribution theory, insisted that the perception of controllability is related with affective responses such as anger, annoyance, or pity. Specifically, a controllable mistake is linked with anger and an uncontrollable mistake is linked with pity [49]. Weiner and Handel [50] found that more controllable mistakes with internal cause brought about more anger.…”
Section: Situational Crisis Communication Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kühne, Weber, and Sommer [49] also said if the crisis is framed as being the organization's responsibility, stakeholders feel anger and eventually a demand for punishment. All in all, crisis type, more specifically, people's perception of the level of responsibility, would also influence people's emotional states when they are exposed to crisis information about a company.…”
Section: Situational Crisis Communication Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%