2018
DOI: 10.1097/qad.0000000000001936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond binary retention in HIV care

Abstract: Beyond the individual patient characteristics typically used to characterize retention in HIV care, we identified specific periods of time and points in the care continuum associated with elevated risk of transitioning out of care. Our findings can contribute to evidence-based recommendations to enhance long-term retention in CNICS. This approach can also be applied to other cohort data to identify retention strategies tailored to each population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients can benefit from tailored support services. Research on patterns of care over time could provide a better understanding of factors associated with patient dropout from care ( 15 ). Patients might respond well to knowledge of the personal and preventive benefits of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients can benefit from tailored support services. Research on patterns of care over time could provide a better understanding of factors associated with patient dropout from care ( 15 ). Patients might respond well to knowledge of the personal and preventive benefits of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while most prior literature regarding retention in care examines factors associated with retention at a single point in time, our model dynamically predicts retention longitudinally. Patients' appointment attendance patterns change over time, with patients often transitioning in and out of care 41 . The method we developed provides a retention risk score at the visit level and recalculates the score at each subsequent visit, incorporating new data that becomes available as well as characteristics that change over time (e.g., prior appointment attendance, HIV viral load, substance use patterns, change of address, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, retention was defined as a contact with health services in specific time intervals after linkage in most studies, but a considerable number of studies defined it as a contact with health services after linkage without further requirements. There are [19] The authors presented the dynamic patterns of care and retention using multistate methodology (Method described in: Lee H, et al, A state transition framework for patient-level modeling of engagement and retention in HIV care using longitudinal cohort data. Statistics in Medicine, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph illustrating this is presented in the Supplement. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of investigating, in addition to the standard cross-sectional CoC, time spend in each of the CoC stages [19,24,34]. Among the reviewed articles, a relatively small number have recently taken efforts to construct longitudinal CoC, most of them focusing on the time to reaching the next CoC stages and risk factors for delays between stages (Supplementary Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%