Beyond Alternative Text and tables: Comparative Analysis of Visualization Tools and Accessibility Methods

Kim, Nam Wook; Ataguba, Grace; Joyner, S. C.; Zhao, Changyun; Im, Hyejin

doi:10.1111/cgf.14833

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hence, BUs are left at the discretion of navigational support from third-party assistive tools. In such a scenario, the BUs are constrained to use assistive tools [11], such as screen readers and talking software, JAWS, voice assistants, Braille, etc. The screen readers primarily convert text into synthesized speech and use an automated voice to read out the content [12].…”

Section: Bu Information Seekingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Approach Limitations [10] BUs face challenges due to lack of navigational support Reliance on third-party assistive tools [11] Utilization of screen readers, JAWS, voice assistants Limited effectiveness of assistive tools [20] Voice-activated email prototype Focused on a specific application (email) [21] Reduce cognitive load using summarized information Limited to information presented in tabular format [22][23][24] Leverage image processing to convert visual information Relies on image recognition; may not cover all content [25] Embed Near Field Connectivity (NFC) for interaction Limited to specific contexts (academic pages) [26] Pigeon algorithm for efficient web page retrieval Focused on improving search result relevancy [27] Image processing for automatic graph description Limited to content with graphical elements [28] Voice assistance augmentation for BUs Primarily extends voice assistant functionality…”

Section: Citedmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

WSREB Mechanism: Web Search Results Exploration Mechanism for Blind Users

Naseer,

Rashid,

Saddal

et al. 2023

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the contemporary digital landscape, web search functions as a pivotal conduit for information dissemination. Nevertheless, blind users (BUs) encounter substantial barriers in leveraging online services, attributable to intrinsic deficiencies in the information structure presented by online platforms. A critical analysis reveals that a considerable segment of BUs perceive online service access as either challenging or unfeasible, with only a fraction of search endeavors culminating successfully. This predicament stems largely from the linear nature of information interaction necessitated for BUs, a process that mandates sequential content relevancy assessment, consequently imposing cognitive strain and fostering information disorientation. Moreover, the prevailing evaluative metrics for web service efficacy—precision and recall—exhibit a glaring oversight of the nuanced behavioral and usability facets pertinent to BUs during search engine design. Addressing this, our study introduces an innovative framework to facilitate information exploration, grounded in the cognitive principles governing BUs. This framework, piloted using the Wikipedia dataset, seeks to revolutionize the search result space through categorical organization, thereby enhancing accessibility for BUs. Empirical and usability assessments, conducted on a cohort of legally blind individuals (N = 25), underscore the framework’s potential, demonstrating notable improvements in web content accessibility and system usability, with categorical accuracy standing at 84% and a usability quotient of 72.5%. This research thus holds significant promise for redefining web search paradigms to foster inclusivity and optimized user experiences for BUs.

show abstract

Section: Bu Information Seekingmentioning

confidence: 99%