2007
DOI: 10.5771/9783845203546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beweisrechtsgrundsätze einer grenzüberschreitenden Strafverfolgung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the possibility for the requested authority to reserve the right to make the execution of specific coercive measures (search and seizure) dependent on the conditions of respect for dual criminality and the consistency with the law of the requested state evolved into a general rule allowing the requested state to refuse any compulsory measure inconsistent with the law and practice of its own country in a similar national case. 25 In this sense, Gleß (2006), pp. 23 See, respectively, Art.…”
Section: Interim Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the possibility for the requested authority to reserve the right to make the execution of specific coercive measures (search and seizure) dependent on the conditions of respect for dual criminality and the consistency with the law of the requested state evolved into a general rule allowing the requested state to refuse any compulsory measure inconsistent with the law and practice of its own country in a similar national case. 25 In this sense, Gleß (2006), pp. 23 See, respectively, Art.…”
Section: Interim Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…386 Wird ein Verfahren eingeleitet, so wird dieses grundsätzlich nach den gleichen Vorschriften durchgeführt wie bei der Ausübung originärer Strafgewalt. 387 398 Art. 7 schwStGB erstreckt dessen Geltungsbereich auf Auslandstaten, die nicht bereits nach den Art.…”
Section: Vermeidung Und Beilegung Von Kompetenzkonflikten In Strafver...unclassified
“…Bu kavram, şüphel n n hakları hususunda b lg lend r lmed ğ b r anda yaptığı açıklamaların, bel rl b r usulden sonra kullanılab lmes ne h zmet etmekted r 162 . Buna göre lk fade alma sırasında hakları konusunda b lg lend r lmeyen şüphel le kamu makamları b r kez daha fade alma ç n karşı karşıya geld kler nde, söz konusu bu k nc fade almada kamu makamları eğer k lk olarak usulüne uygun şek lde § 136 StPO'da (CMK m. 147) 163 yer alan hakları şüphel ye b ld r r ve de daha sonra k nc fade almaya kadark açıklamalarının h çb r s n n muhakemede kullanılmayacağını bel rt rse, şüphel n n n tel kl aydınlatmadan sonrak beyanları, yan k nc fade almadak açıklamaları, muhakemede kullanılab lecekt r 164 .…”
Section: Del L Yasaklarına İl şK N Türk Ve Alman Hukuklarındak Farklı Yaklaşım Yasak Usul Aldatma İç N Ne Anlama Gelmekted R?unclassified