2021
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beware of white matter hyperintensities causing systematic errors in FreeSurfer gray matter segmentations!

Abstract: Volumetric estimates of subcortical and cortical structures, extracted from T1‐weighted MRIs, are widely used in many clinical and research applications. Here, we investigate the impact of the presence of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) on FreeSurfer gray matter (GM) structure volumes and its possible bias on functional relationships. T1‐weighted images from 1,077 participants (4,321 timepoints) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were processed with FreeSurfer version 6.0.0. WMHs were se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, T2 FLAIR white matter hyperintensities were determined using a fully convoluted neural network, which was the top-ranking method in a recent multiscanner challenge [26] and manually checked for accuracy. These white matter hyperintensities were subtracted from the Freesurfer subcortical volumes as they are known to artificially inflate volumes [27]. Adjusted volumes were used for all subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Mri Processing and Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, T2 FLAIR white matter hyperintensities were determined using a fully convoluted neural network, which was the top-ranking method in a recent multiscanner challenge [26] and manually checked for accuracy. These white matter hyperintensities were subtracted from the Freesurfer subcortical volumes as they are known to artificially inflate volumes [27]. Adjusted volumes were used for all subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Mri Processing and Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the objectives of the proposed method was to be able to deal with images with white mater lesions. This is fundamental, as if we do not take into account those regions, they are normally misclassified as a cGM or sGM (which also affects the cortical thickness estimation) (Dadar et al, 2021 ). The results of WM lesion segmentation are summarized in Table 3 (left and right lesions were considered together).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final segmentation output (aseg.mgz) was then used to obtain individual masks for cortical GM, deep GM, cerebellar GM, WM, and cerebellar WM based on the FreeSurfer look up table available at https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/AnatomicalROI/FreeSurferColorLUT. Since FreeSurfer tends to segment some WMHs as GM (Dadar et al, 2021c), we also segmented the WMHs using a previously validated automated method (Dadar et al, 2017b, 2017a) and used them to correct the tissue masks (i.e. WMH voxels that were segmented as cortical GM or deep GM by FreeSurfer were relabelled as WM, and WMH voxels that were segmented as cerebellar GM by FreeSurfer were relabelled as cerebellar WM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%