1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63222-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bevel-Down Superior to Bevel-Up in Intradermal Skin Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For standardization, the diameter of induration should be measured transversely to the long axis of the forearm and recorded in millimeters. [23] Reliable reading of the Mantoux skin test requires standardization of procedures, training, supervision, and practice. This may also include periodic standardized reliability testing.…”
Section: Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For standardization, the diameter of induration should be measured transversely to the long axis of the forearm and recorded in millimeters. [23] Reliable reading of the Mantoux skin test requires standardization of procedures, training, supervision, and practice. This may also include periodic standardized reliability testing.…”
Section: Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intradermal vaccination has been investigated to address these limitations and shown to offer immunologic advantages, such as a reduction of dose needed for protective immunity and an elevated immune response in the elderly, which is the population most susceptible to influenza-related morbidity and mortality [57]. However, intradermal immunization with vaccines in solution requires needle injection by medical personnel, which is an often painful, time consuming and unreliable, as well as associated with needle injuries and pathogen transmission [8, 9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intradermal injection requires specialized training and is often unreliable [11]. Scarification also requires training and delivers an inefficient and variable dose [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%