2018
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3833-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between-year vocal aging in female red deer (Cervus elaphus)

Abstract: ObjectivesStudying animal vocal aging has potential implication in the field of animal welfare and for modeling human voice aging. The objective was to examine, using a repeated measures approach, the between-year changes of weight, social discomfort score (bites of other hinds on hind pelt), body condition score (fat reserves) and acoustic variables of the nasal (closed-mouth) and the oral (open-mouth) contact calls produced by farmed red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus) toward their young.ResultsRepeated measures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We classified the chirps from the second recording with DFA functions derived from the first recording, considering the value of correct cross‐validation as a measure of the retention of individuality over time (Briefer et al, 2010; Matrosova, Volodin, Volodina, Vasilieva, & Kochetkova, 2010; Smirnova et al, 2016). We used a repeated‐measures ANOVA controlled for individuality, to compare the values of correct assignment of chirps to correct callers between recordings of different years (Volodin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We classified the chirps from the second recording with DFA functions derived from the first recording, considering the value of correct cross‐validation as a measure of the retention of individuality over time (Briefer et al, 2010; Matrosova, Volodin, Volodina, Vasilieva, & Kochetkova, 2010; Smirnova et al, 2016). We used a repeated‐measures ANOVA controlled for individuality, to compare the values of correct assignment of chirps to correct callers between recordings of different years (Volodin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to do so, we measured 6 variables: (1) peak frequency (PF), (2) fundamental frequency (F 0 ), (3) maximum frequency of fundamental frequency (F 0max ), (4) minimum frequency of fundamental frequency (F 0min ), (5) duration of syllable (T), and (6) interval of syllables (TI, Table 5 ; Fig. 3 ), and we chose these variables following some previous similar studies [ 2 , 25 , 50 , 51 ]. We identified 4 different types of calls consisting of repeated, single-syllable calls from 61 recordings of 30 breeding adults (see also Supplemental Table S2 ), which were called a (46 recordings including 517 calls from 23 individuals), b (2 recordings; 215 calls; 2 individuals), c (8 recordings; 59 calls; 4 individuals), and d (5 recordings; 18 calls; 4 individuals), 809 calls in total.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%