2016
DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2015.1134465
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between X and Y: how process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
87
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…So, to understand why decisions are taken we must pay attention to the explanations of actors and the traditions they draw upon to make sense of what they do. But, unlike Bennet and Checkel's () version of process tracing (but see Pouliot and Trampusch and Palier for a broader conceptualization that better fits our application), traditions are not path determining. They are discursive repertoires that can and do change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…So, to understand why decisions are taken we must pay attention to the explanations of actors and the traditions they draw upon to make sense of what they do. But, unlike Bennet and Checkel's () version of process tracing (but see Pouliot and Trampusch and Palier for a broader conceptualization that better fits our application), traditions are not path determining. They are discursive repertoires that can and do change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Process tracing reconstructs a chain of events to identify causal mechanisms within a case study (Beach and Pedersen, 2013;Trampusch and Palier, 2016). Process tracing first reconstructs the historical record, establishing what and when decisions occurred, with a particular focus on identifying the sequence of events.…”
Section: Process Tracing In Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the unfolding of the process was linked to wider events, such as the prospects and possibilities for discussing agriculture in the UNFCCC process and the level of interest for CSA. The need for considering contextual conditions as well as the sequential nature of policy processes is often advocated in policy studies literatures (Trampusch and Palier, ), but few policy entrepreneurship studies have been able to conceptualize and operationalize this. Our conceptual framework that considers the dynamic interplay between conditions, activities and implications – or strategizing – helps us to better understand and explain how policy entrepreneurs operate, and appreciate the process of establishing collaborations between a diversity of actors from different levels, domains, and sectors to address global complex problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%