2020
DOI: 10.1093/mts/mtaa004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between the Signposts: Thematic Interpolation and Structural Defamiliarization in Prokofiev’s Sonata Process

Abstract: This article explores the manner in which Prokofiev’s interpolation of unrelated material in the middle of a traditional theme-space ironizes a seemingly normative sonata process in the first movement of his Second Piano Sonata (1912). By serving as the motivic, tonal, and rhetorical source of much that follows, this interpolation launches a quietly subversive counternarrative that threatens to undermine the traditional sonata narrative upon which the P theme had embarked. I invoke Russian Formalist literary t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have framed elements of Prokofiev's music in such terms, focusing on the manipulation of inherited forms to create an ironic effect (e.g. Rifkin 2009 and Perry 2020; see also Shapovalov 2004). Although I am focusing on the second‐order treatment of topics, which, in Barthes's model, does not necessary connote irony, the references are similarly defamiliarised through the omission of key elements: sufficient characteristics are present such that the topic is understood as the reference point, yet elements are distorted to interpret it as manipulated, suggesting a double voicing that is central to irony (Sheinberg 2000 and Frymoyer 2017).…”
Section: Topics As Second‐order Formal Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have framed elements of Prokofiev's music in such terms, focusing on the manipulation of inherited forms to create an ironic effect (e.g. Rifkin 2009 and Perry 2020; see also Shapovalov 2004). Although I am focusing on the second‐order treatment of topics, which, in Barthes's model, does not necessary connote irony, the references are similarly defamiliarised through the omission of key elements: sufficient characteristics are present such that the topic is understood as the reference point, yet elements are distorted to interpret it as manipulated, suggesting a double voicing that is central to irony (Sheinberg 2000 and Frymoyer 2017).…”
Section: Topics As Second‐order Formal Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%