Between rules, norms and shared understandings: how institutional pressures shape the implementation of data-driven communications

Abstract

PurposeBig data and analytics make digital communications more effective, but little is known about how institutional pressures shape data-driven communications. These pressures determine and constrain how, what, when and to whom practitioners should communicate. This empirical study explores how institutional forces influence the use of data in guiding digital communications. The paper identifies factors that impact communications and shape practitioner views on particular tools in their day-to-day work.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a qualitative exploratory approach with in-depth interviews of 15 Australian communication practitioners through the lens of neo-institutional theory. Thematic analysis was applied to identify three main themes.FindingsCommunications professionals disclosed how they were influenced by coercive institutional forces such as ambiguous data privacy regulations, normative forces that shaped ethical concerns, professionalism and various challenges, and mimetic forces that determined shared methods and implementation of digital communications technologies such as analytics. Furthermore, the authors reveal how analytics – tools typically associated with uncertainty and mimetic influences – exert coercive pressures that could lead to misguided decision-making.Research limitations/implicationsThis study’s findings highlight the need for practitioners to learn more about the inner workings of analytics tools and for managers to determine if the perceived benefits of these solutions outweigh any undesirable effects.Practical implicationsThe study contributes to extant research on digitalization in strategic communication by providing new insights into practitioner views and challenges with digital communications technologies.Originality/valueDespite the considerable effects of institutional pressures, this study is the first to explore the impacts of data-driven communications at the level of individual practitioners. The paper advances neo-institutional theory in public relations (PR), strategic communication and corporate communications at the micro level.

Navigating the AI era: university communication strategies and perspectives on generative AI tools

“…Furthermore, Zerfass, Hagelstein and Tench [2020] show communication professionals have a limited understanding of AI and lack individual competencies of these technologies. Institutional pressures, from data privacy laws to ethical norms, shape the use of analytics in digital communications, highlighting the influence of coercive, normative, and mimetic forces in strategic communication [Economou, Luck & Bartlett, 2023].…”

Komunikasi Sebagai Alat Kontrol Sosial: Analisis Kritis Berdasarkan Pemikiran Friedrich Pollock

“…Hubungan antara komunikasi dan pembentukan norma-norma sosial melibatkan peran penting komunikasi dalam membentuk pemahaman bersama tentang perilaku yang dianggap benar atau salah (Economou et al, 2023). Komunikasi memfasilitasi proses negosiasi makna dan konstruksi identitas kolektif yang mendukung norma-norma tersebut.…”

Corporate Governance of Sustainable Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Strategic Communication (SC) and Digital Marketing (DM): United Arab Emirates Guidelines

“…The study called for analyzing various types of text generated by AI agents before establishing any global rules on appropriate use. (Economou, 2023) examined the impact of institutional forces on the use of Big Data in guiding organizational communication strategy, along with digital challenges faced by communication planners within the organization. The results of a study by (Maspul, 2021) showed that customers were satisfied with AI-based food production systems supporting sustainability in the United Arab Emirates by reducing carbon footprint, using fewer resources, and minimizing waste.…”

“…(Vinuesa et al 2020) used the term "Sustainable AI" to refer to artificial intelligence that contributes to achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable AI is AI that adheres to regulatory principles, including organizational processes, regulations, best practices, and definitions/standards to meet transformative potentials of sustainable development while simultaneously protecting the environment and enabling economic growth and social justice (Tsafack Chetsa, 2021) Organizations have increasingly utilized big data and digital analytics to make digital communications more effective (Economou et al, 2023). International organizations have also focused on researching ways to reduce concerns and negative impacts that coincide with the use of artificial intelligence (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2021).…”