2019
DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2019.1640378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between queer liberalisms and Muslim masculinities: LGBTQI+ Muslim asylum assessment in Germany

Abstract: This paper focuses on Germany's assessment of refugee claims made by LGBTQI+ Muslims. Based on the analysis of several asylum decisions, it seeks to render insight into the ways in which credibility is assessed at the intersection of sexuality and Islam. Drawing on Jasbir Puar's theory of homonationalism, this paper first argues that Germany is more likely to grant protection in cases where the asylum seeker successfully adopts German/Western standards of moral on gay/queer sexualities. Secondly, this paper di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their gender-nonconformity, LGBTQ* refugees reported feeling excluded from co-ethnic communities as well as the general society (Kahn 2015). Corresponding research within Germany has used an intersectional lens and strongly focused on LGBTQ* refugees' experiences during the asylum process (Dustin & Held 2018;Held 2019;Hübner 2016;Tschalaer 2019). For example, Dustin and Held (2018) have found that intersectionality is often overlooked within the asylum process, i.e., asylum seekers are merely assessed on the grounds of their sexual orientation/ gender identity while other social categories are neglected.…”
Section: Post-migration Experiences Of Minority Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to their gender-nonconformity, LGBTQ* refugees reported feeling excluded from co-ethnic communities as well as the general society (Kahn 2015). Corresponding research within Germany has used an intersectional lens and strongly focused on LGBTQ* refugees' experiences during the asylum process (Dustin & Held 2018;Held 2019;Hübner 2016;Tschalaer 2019). For example, Dustin and Held (2018) have found that intersectionality is often overlooked within the asylum process, i.e., asylum seekers are merely assessed on the grounds of their sexual orientation/ gender identity while other social categories are neglected.…”
Section: Post-migration Experiences Of Minority Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dustin and Held (2018) have found that intersectionality is often overlooked within the asylum process, i.e., asylum seekers are merely assessed on the grounds of their sexual orientation/ gender identity while other social categories are neglected. Tschalaer (2019) highlighted how LGBTQ* refugees may face discrimination in the asylum process, for example by translators and immigration officials. In sum, these studies suggested that LGBTQ* asylum seekers may be pressured to adhere to Western stereotypes of LGBTQ* populations to gain safety in Germany (Tschalaer 2019), which likely impacts their mental health.…”
Section: Post-migration Experiences Of Minority Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples include expectations that applicants will show they have attended gay pride marches (Bennett & Thomas, 2013) or visited gay districts in the asylum country (Hersh, 2015). Remarkably, stereotypes often apply not only to asylum-seekers, but also to their societies of origin, which are seen as entirely hostile towards sexual minorities (Dhoest, 2019;Hedlund & Wimark, 2019;Tschalaer, 2020). In one study it was reported that this had led officials to disbelieve applicants who claimed their male family members had reacted positively when they disclosed their sexuality (Hedlund & Wimark, 2019).…”
Section: Disbelief Of Sexual Orientationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, in a context of high suspicion toward asylum seekers, this formalization has turned into a restrictive evaluating apparatus of queer applicants' credibility. Numerous academic works have emphasized how narrow understandings of sexuality and gender 1 , as well as expectations of performance of victimhood or narratives of migration experienced as liberation, actually lead to excluding queer 2 applicants from asylum (Morgan, 2006;Rehaag, 2008;Berg and Millbank, 2009;Kobelinsky, 2012;Lewis, 2014;Murray, 2014Murray, , 2015Ferreira, 2015;Giametta, 2016Giametta, , 2017Akin, 2017;Dustin and Held, 2018;Hertoghs and Schinkel, 2018;Hedlund and Wimark, 2019;Rinaldi and Fernando, 2019;Tschalaer 2019;Tschalaer 2020;Sari, 2020). A more recent study has focused attention on the ways support organizations assist queer migrants with their asylum procedure (Cesaro, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%