2006
DOI: 10.1080/02560054.2006.9653347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between privilege and subpoena: Protecting confidential sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Journalists' need to protect sources represents one of the most central ethical considerations of the profession (Brand 2006). The "chilling effect" that disclosure can have (Goodwin v United Kingdom 1996) includes an increasing unwillingness to give journalists valuable information, so that the public is left uninformed on key issues (Penrod 2004), as well as reluctance by journalists themselves to investigate issues: in 2015 14% of US investigative journalists said that concerns over surveillance had prevented them from pursuing a story or reaching out to a particular source, and 2% had considered leaving the profession entirely (Pew Research Center 2015).…”
Section: Source Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journalists' need to protect sources represents one of the most central ethical considerations of the profession (Brand 2006). The "chilling effect" that disclosure can have (Goodwin v United Kingdom 1996) includes an increasing unwillingness to give journalists valuable information, so that the public is left uninformed on key issues (Penrod 2004), as well as reluctance by journalists themselves to investigate issues: in 2015 14% of US investigative journalists said that concerns over surveillance had prevented them from pursuing a story or reaching out to a particular source, and 2% had considered leaving the profession entirely (Pew Research Center 2015).…”
Section: Source Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%