2020
DOI: 10.16995/ee.1242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between Prefigurative Politics and Collaborative Governance: Vernacular Humanitarianism in the Migration Movements of 2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fontanari and Borri, 2017; Hamann and Karakayali, 2016). Since then, scholars have increasingly turned to analyzing these “vernacular humanitarianisms” (Brković, 2023; Sutter, 2020), asking about their potential for unsettling the hierarchical logics of formal humanitarianism and the inherent coloniality of Europe’s asylum and border regimes (Picozza, 2021; Rozakou, 2017; Sandri, 2018). Sandri and Bugoni (2018) have focused on aspects of improvisation and informality as defining the work of volunteer groups in Calais’ “Jungle,” showing how these “makeshift humanitarians” came to develop more overt political stances by refusing to cooperate with state bordering and surveillance practices.…”
Section: Local Activism In a Post-reception Post-welcome Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fontanari and Borri, 2017; Hamann and Karakayali, 2016). Since then, scholars have increasingly turned to analyzing these “vernacular humanitarianisms” (Brković, 2023; Sutter, 2020), asking about their potential for unsettling the hierarchical logics of formal humanitarianism and the inherent coloniality of Europe’s asylum and border regimes (Picozza, 2021; Rozakou, 2017; Sandri, 2018). Sandri and Bugoni (2018) have focused on aspects of improvisation and informality as defining the work of volunteer groups in Calais’ “Jungle,” showing how these “makeshift humanitarians” came to develop more overt political stances by refusing to cooperate with state bordering and surveillance practices.…”
Section: Local Activism In a Post-reception Post-welcome Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last fi ve years, there has been a clear increase of anthropological interest in the grassroots humanitarianism (McGee and Pelham 2018), voluntary humanitarianism (Sandri 2018), domestic humanitarianism (Altman 2019), everyday humanitarianism (Brković 2016b;Horstmann 2017;Richey 2018;Sandberg and Andersen 2020), solidary humanitarianism (Rozakou 2017), activist humanitarianism (Reda and Proudfoot 2020), vernacular humanitarianism (Brković 2017;Sutter 2020), demotic humanitarianism (Taithe 2019), diaspora humanitarianism (Kleist 2021), distributed humanitarianism (Dunn forthcoming) and similar forms of 'humanitarianism from below' (Kloos 2020) and 'citizen aid' (Fechter and Schwittay 2019). Th ere has also been somewhat of a split in analytical foci when discussing this sort of informal support between the Global North and the Global South.…”
Section: Growing Interest In Small-scale Humanitarianismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propelled by a spirit of historical reparation and the mantra of wir schaffen das (we can do this), German civil society reacted to the unprecedented numbers of arrivals with a remarkable wave of solidarity. Much has been written about the German Willkommenskultur (culture of welcome) emerging from the ‘long summer of migration’ (Hess et al, 2017) and the opposite poles of vernacular humanitarianism (Dinkelaker et al, 2021; Sutter, 2020) and anxieties over loss of control (Zehfuss, 2020) it brought about. Yet, while debates about the Willkommenskultur have largely focussed on Germany, Merkel's decision to temporarily suspend the EU’s long‐established practices of deterrence and border control set in motion a chain of events that profoundly affected the political orientation of Europe as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%