2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between-litter variation in developmental studies of hormones and behavior: Inflated false positives and diminished power

Abstract: Abstract-Developmental studies of hormones and behavior often include litter mates-rodent siblings that share early-life experiences and genes. Due to between-litter variation (i.e., litter effects), the statistical assumption of independent observations is untenable. In two literatures-natural variation in maternal care and prenatal stress-entire litters are categorized based on maternal behavior or experimental condition. Here, we (1) review both literatures; (2) simulate false positive rates for commonly us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied linear mixed-effects models (LMM) based on restricted maximum likelihood estimates using the package lme4 (Bates, Maechler, Bolker, & Walker, 2015). See text for statistics siblings, and thus to avoid an increased risk of false positive results (Williams, Carlsson, & Bürkner, 2017). Sibling differences in body mass were calculated as the deviation from the litter mean (Bautista, Zepeda, et al, 2015;Rödel, Bautista, Roder, Gilbert, & Hudson, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We applied linear mixed-effects models (LMM) based on restricted maximum likelihood estimates using the package lme4 (Bates, Maechler, Bolker, & Walker, 2015). See text for statistics siblings, and thus to avoid an increased risk of false positive results (Williams, Carlsson, & Bürkner, 2017). Sibling differences in body mass were calculated as the deviation from the litter mean (Bautista, Zepeda, et al, 2015;Rödel, Bautista, Roder, Gilbert, & Hudson, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pups from 12 litters (n = 6 pups per litter, ntotal = 72) were put separately into small boxes at room temperature (21 ± 0.5°C) for 5 min on different postnatal days and the dynamic of their peripheral body temperature was recorded using an infrared thermal camera. See text for statistics siblings, and thus to avoid an increased risk of false positive results (Williams, Carlsson, & Bürkner, 2017). We also included sex as a fixed factor, in particular as some studies in rodents indicate a higher thermogenic capacity in female pups (Harshaw et al, 2014;Valle, García-Palmer, Oliver, & Roca, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then summarized p(δ S t |y) with the posterior median and highest density interval (δ S t = 0.60, 95-% HDI = [0.03, 1.20]). This effect size is like Cohen's d, but is computed with respect to ν and can be extended to more complex methods such as multilevel models (Williams, Carlsson, & Bürkner, 2017).…”
Section: Posterior Predictivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their advice on how to estimate treatment effects when the treatment is allocated to a litter is, however, rather ambiguous. A similar paper [14] describes how litter effects are 5 ignored in behavioural neuroendocrinology. These two papers focus on the implications of ignoring litter effects on statistical inference, both in terms of generating false positive treatment effects (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%