Between Faith and Science:World Culture Theory and Comparative Education

Abstract

World culture theory seeks to explain the apparent educational convergence through a neo-institutionalist lens, seeing global rationalization in education as driven by the logic of science and the myth of progress. While critics have challenged these assumptions by focusing on local manifestations of world-level tendencies, such critique is comfortably accommodated within world culture theory. We approach the debate from a fresh perspective by examining its ideological foundations. We also highlight its shift from notions of myth and enactment toward advocacy for particular models, and we show that world culture theory can become normative, while obscuring our view of policy convergence. Finally, we critique the methods and evidence in world culture research. We argue that such research, while failing to support its own claims, actually produces world culture, as its assumptions and parameters create the very image of consensus and homogeneity that world culture theorists expect scholars to accept-in faith-as empirically grounded.

PISA for Schools: Topological Rationality and New Spaces of the OECD’s Global Educational Governance

“…Moreover, the modernist, neopositivist social science underpinning the tests and their application globally can be seen to be exemplary of the global diffusion of modernity suggested by world culture theory. In its early manifestations, this position often downplayed the importance of local and/or national contextual considerations and agency, but later renditions have tried to work across the convergence of the global and the specificities of the local (Carney et al 2012). We would see our research as acknowledging both "top-down" (global) and "bottom-up" (local) processes inherent within the local reform of schooling policy and practice, yet we argue in this article that concepts from topology provide a productive way of thinking about these new spatialities of globalization in education.…”

Imagining school autonomy in high-performing education systems: East Asia as a source of policy referencing in England

“…But they focus on the generic themes that policymakers across the world have promoted, and from this claim that there is a convergence of policy to a 'world model' (Carney, Rappleye, and Silova 2012). As demonstrated above, although substantive reforms have been pursued under the common mantra of enhancing school autonomy and been legitimated by referencing to 'world-class' systems/international models, the scope, form and nature of implementation has both varied markedly and been defined by local contexts.…”

Studying Global Human Rights Education. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches

“…Whilst these organizations are characterized by coherence and control, structures are "decoupled" from each other and from ongoing activities, which can be seen in rule violations, unimplemented decisions, poor technical efficiency, and "subverted" or "vague" control systems (Meyer, Rowan 1977) However, critics of WCT see in the concept of "decoupling" the accommodation of criticism into the theory (Carney, Rappleye, Silova 2012). Ramirez et al (2006), applying WCT to the field of HRE, suggest that despite some variation between nations, concrete examples of HRE initiatives are found in every region of the world and that this is evidence of the spread of the human rights discourse.…”