Between compliance and systemic change

Kupiec, Tomasz; Olejniczak, Karol; Wojtowicz, Dominika

doi:10.4324/9780429286452-11

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several examples contradicting this representation have been mentioned in Section ‘Empirical observations not fully explained by current frameworks’. In addition, one can find evidence of a dynamic changes of evaluation practice in multi-organisational policy evaluation systems in EU countries (Kupiec et al, 2020), developing countries (Horton, 1999), European Commission Directorates (De Francesco, 2019), government agencies (House et al, 1996; Pattyn, 2014) or NGOs (Love, 1998). These observations indicate that how evaluation is conducted and used may or even is expected to change over time.…”

Section: Directions For Future Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding evaluation use from an organisational perspective: A review of the literature and a research agenda

2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why do some types of evaluation use prevail in certain contexts and not in others? The aim of this article is to advance knowledge about organisational factors of evaluation use, that is, determinants of evaluation use grounded in organisational theories. We critically review existing frameworks of organisational factors of evaluation use, highlighting key differences between them and pointing out discrepancies with empirical insights. We discuss the merits of two potential areas for future research that can help concretise theoretical stances: considering organisational legitimacy as a potential direct determinant of evaluation use and incorporating a dynamic perspective in organisational frameworks of evaluation use.

show abstract