2014
DOI: 10.1177/0022002714545331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Between Collaboration and Disobedience

Abstract: This article examines the behavior of the Guantánamo detainees in terms of collaboration and disobedience and how it influences their chances of getting a release recommendation. Joint Task Force Guantanamo–authored memoranda on 765 detainees are used to create a network of accusations between detainees and an attribute data set, which are analyzed using multivariate regression and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. It is found that while the distribution of incriminating statements obeys a power law, 62.6 percent of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematically, the power-law relation between two quantities y and x can be defined as y = ax −β , where a is a prefactor and β is the scaling exponent. Power laws are common in the social and natural world and have been shown to exist in phenomena as diverse as the gamma-ray intensity of solar flares (Clauset, Shalizi and Newman, 2009), the sizes of strike waves (Biggs, 2005), and the distribution of accusations between detainees (Deutschmann, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematically, the power-law relation between two quantities y and x can be defined as y = ax −β , where a is a prefactor and β is the scaling exponent. Power laws are common in the social and natural world and have been shown to exist in phenomena as diverse as the gamma-ray intensity of solar flares (Clauset, Shalizi and Newman, 2009), the sizes of strike waves (Biggs, 2005), and the distribution of accusations between detainees (Deutschmann, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, Tidy (2017, 96–8, 102–5) critiques WikiLeaks’ video editing and other source interventions, to resist taking official US stories or WikiLeaks counternarratives at face value. Another assembles data from leaked Joint Task Force-Guantánamo documents regarding detainees (Deutschmann 2016), declaring an “urgent need” for research on “prisoner treatment” and the consequences of prisoners’ behavior for “how US authorities react.” A third uses US Trade Representative documents on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement to analyze normative aspects of interest representation (Kuyper 2016), claiming that “interest in exclusion … by governments and bureaucrats,” with information such as treaty drafts “deliberately obscured from public view … violates standards of inclusive democracy” (318).…”
Section: Opaque Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%