Between appropriation and assassination

Abstract

Purpose Oriented to ongoing student and university momentums for decolonial futures, the purpose of this paper is to interrogate the role and status of mainstream international development curricula and pedagogies by critiquing two absences in the sub-discipline’s teaching formulae: appropriations and assassinations. Design/methodology/approach The author draws from a decade of research on oil extraction in Central Africa, including ethnographic work with two communities in Cameroon along the Chad–Cameroon Oil Pipeline; four years of research (interview-based and unofficial or grey materials) on the 1983 August Revolution in Burkina Faso and assassination of Thomas Sankara; and five years of experience teaching international development in North America, Western Europe and North and Eastern Africa. Findings Through a critical synthesis of political and rhetorical practices that are often considered in isolation (i.e. political assassinations and corporate appropriation of Indigenous knowledges), the author makes the case for what the author calls pedagogical disobedience: an anticipatory decolonial development curricula and praxis that is attentive to the simultaneity of violence and misappropriation within colonial operations of power (i.e. “coloniality of power” or “coloniality”). Originality/value This paper contributes to debates within international development about the future of the discipline given its neo-colonial and colonial constitutions and functions with a grounded attention to how this opens up possibilities for teaching praxis and scholarship in action.

Geographical education II: Anti-racist, decolonial futures

“…In Chan’s (2023) terms, my decoloniality is not your decoloniality. Calls for nuance and singularity have implications for the concrete ways in which pedagogies and teaching resources represent people and places, and there is exciting scope for, among many other things, developing the use of narrative tools (Alderman et al, 2019), ‘unlearning’ of coloniality (Murrey et al, 2023) and pedagogical disobedience (Murrey, 2019; Murrey and Daley, 2023) so that geographical education might play (even a small) part undoing and re-writing the injustices behind McKittrick’s words that opened this report: what profoundly inspiring possibilities might a more expansive, less fragile, anti-racist and decolonial geographical education flourish into and open opportunities for?…”

Radicalizing Managers’ Climate Education: Getting Beyond the Bull**** Fairy Tale of Eternal Economic Growth

“…Naturally, if business schools remain geared toward “producing” the hired hands that keep capitalist businesses running smoothly (Khurana, 2010), there is no place for disobedience. Consequently, the type of pedagogical disobedience (Murrey, 2019) I propose is an uphill struggle since it breaks with institutionalized curricular contents like those related to growth. For instance, the editor of a well-known higher education magazine recently questioned me: “Are you suggesting that managers should be rebelling too?…”