Abstract:Background
Stress is associated with binge eating and emotional eating (EE) cross-sectionally. However, few studies have examined stress longitudinally, limiting understanding of how within-person fluctuations in stress influence EE over time and whether stress is a risk factor or consequence of EE. Additionally, little is known regarding how the biological stress response relates to EE.
Methods
We used an intensive, longitudinal design to examine between-person and within-person effects… Show more
“…Financial hardship is typically accompanied by considerable psychological stress (Frankham et al, 2020), which is a substantial risk factor for BE (e.g., Fowler et al, 2022;Smith et al, 2021). Interestingly, we found that a measure of general COVID-19 related distress (i.e., "What level of stress and/or distress did you feel TODAY in relation to COVID-19?")…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Several potential mechanisms could underlie an association between financial hardship and BE phenotypes during COVID‐19. Financial hardship is typically accompanied by considerable psychological stress (Frankham et al, 2020 ), which is a substantial risk factor for BE (e.g., Fowler et al, 2022 ; Smith et al, 2021 ). Interestingly, we found that a measure of general COVID‐19 related distress (i.e., “What level of stress and/or distress did you feel TODAY in relation to COVID‐19?”) was not significantly correlated with financial hardship in our study ( r = .02, p = .810), indicating the need for measures that tap psychological stress related to financial concerns in particular.…”
Background
COVID‐19 was associated with significant financial hardship and increased binge eating (BE). However, it is largely unknown whether financial stressors contributed to BE during the pandemic. We used a longitudinal, cotwin control design that controls for genetic/environmental confounds by comparing twins in the same family to examine whether financial hardship during COVID‐19 was associated with BE.
Methods
Female twins (
N
= 158;
M
age
= 22.13) from the Michigan State University Twin Registry rated financial stressors (e.g., inability to afford necessities) daily for 49 consecutive days during COVID‐19. We first examined whether financial hardship was associated with BE phenotypes across the full sample. We then examined whether cotwins who differed on financial hardship also differed in BE.
Results
Participants who experienced greater mean financial hardship across the study had significantly greater dimensional BE symptoms, and participants who experienced greater financial hardship on a given day reported significantly more emotional eating that day. These results were replicated in cotwin control analyses. Twins who experienced more financial hardship than their cotwin across the study reported greater dimensional BE symptoms than their cotwin, and participants who experienced more financial hardship than their cotwin on a given day reported greater emotional eating that day. Results were identical when restricting analyses to monozygotic twins, suggesting associations were not due to genetic confounds.
Conclusions
Results suggest that BE‐related symptoms may be elevated in women who experienced financial hardship during COVID‐19 independent of potential genetic/environmental confounds. However, additional research in larger samples is needed.
Public Significance
Little is known regarding how financial difficulties during the COVID‐19 pandemic may have contributed to increased binge eating (BE). We found preliminary evidence that financial hardship during COVID‐19 may be associated with greater rates of BE‐related symptoms even when comparing twins from the same family. While additional research is needed, results suggest that people who experienced financial hardship during COVID‐19 may be at increased risk for BE.
“…Financial hardship is typically accompanied by considerable psychological stress (Frankham et al, 2020), which is a substantial risk factor for BE (e.g., Fowler et al, 2022;Smith et al, 2021). Interestingly, we found that a measure of general COVID-19 related distress (i.e., "What level of stress and/or distress did you feel TODAY in relation to COVID-19?")…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Several potential mechanisms could underlie an association between financial hardship and BE phenotypes during COVID‐19. Financial hardship is typically accompanied by considerable psychological stress (Frankham et al, 2020 ), which is a substantial risk factor for BE (e.g., Fowler et al, 2022 ; Smith et al, 2021 ). Interestingly, we found that a measure of general COVID‐19 related distress (i.e., “What level of stress and/or distress did you feel TODAY in relation to COVID‐19?”) was not significantly correlated with financial hardship in our study ( r = .02, p = .810), indicating the need for measures that tap psychological stress related to financial concerns in particular.…”
Background
COVID‐19 was associated with significant financial hardship and increased binge eating (BE). However, it is largely unknown whether financial stressors contributed to BE during the pandemic. We used a longitudinal, cotwin control design that controls for genetic/environmental confounds by comparing twins in the same family to examine whether financial hardship during COVID‐19 was associated with BE.
Methods
Female twins (
N
= 158;
M
age
= 22.13) from the Michigan State University Twin Registry rated financial stressors (e.g., inability to afford necessities) daily for 49 consecutive days during COVID‐19. We first examined whether financial hardship was associated with BE phenotypes across the full sample. We then examined whether cotwins who differed on financial hardship also differed in BE.
Results
Participants who experienced greater mean financial hardship across the study had significantly greater dimensional BE symptoms, and participants who experienced greater financial hardship on a given day reported significantly more emotional eating that day. These results were replicated in cotwin control analyses. Twins who experienced more financial hardship than their cotwin across the study reported greater dimensional BE symptoms than their cotwin, and participants who experienced more financial hardship than their cotwin on a given day reported greater emotional eating that day. Results were identical when restricting analyses to monozygotic twins, suggesting associations were not due to genetic confounds.
Conclusions
Results suggest that BE‐related symptoms may be elevated in women who experienced financial hardship during COVID‐19 independent of potential genetic/environmental confounds. However, additional research in larger samples is needed.
Public Significance
Little is known regarding how financial difficulties during the COVID‐19 pandemic may have contributed to increased binge eating (BE). We found preliminary evidence that financial hardship during COVID‐19 may be associated with greater rates of BE‐related symptoms even when comparing twins from the same family. While additional research is needed, results suggest that people who experienced financial hardship during COVID‐19 may be at increased risk for BE.
“…This association is only marginally translated to the between-person level; people who tend to experience stressors more often over the study period, or to report more unpleasant levels, had slightly higher levels of food cravings, but this became non-significant after accounting for age, BMI and gender in sensitivity checks. It could be that the experience of a stressor triggers an immediate increase in distress and consequently an immediate willingness to eat in order to diminish such distress (Fowler et al, 2022;Klatzkin et al, 2022), and so the cravings are quickly resolved. Further research could explore whether negative emotions mediate the within-person relationship between a stressor experience and food craving.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During stressful experiences or periods, people might have difficulties distinguishing between hunger and distress resulting in overeating (Bruch, 1961;Kaplan & Kaplan, 1957), and may want to eat as a way to escape or avoid distress (Heatherton & Baumeister, 1991), or to seek emotional relief (Fowler et al, 2022;Klatzkin et al, 2022). Additionally, not all events will result in a similar stressful response and health impact (Cohen et al, 2016).…”
Daily‐life stressors and food cravings are dynamic and vary within and across persons. Some evidence suggests interpersonal stressors increase appetite. However, little is known about the association of food craving with different types of stressors at the momentary level in the general population. We aimed to explore the momentary relationships between daily‐life stressful events and food craving in a non‐clinical community sample, and to compare the associations with food craving when the most stressful event was perceived as interpersonal versus non‐interpersonal. We used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to collect reports on the most stressful event, perceived stressor type, stressor appraisal, and food craving from 123 adults three times a day scheduled at fixed intervals over 10 days. Mixed effects random intercepts and slopes models examined the within‐ and between‐person associations. Experiencing a stressor was significantly positively associated with within‐person food craving at the same measurement. No differences in momentary food craving were found when the most stressful event was perceived as interpersonal or non‐interpersonal (within‐person level). However, frequently reporting the most stressful event as interpersonal (vs. non‐interpersonal) was positively associated with food craving across the study (between‐person level), particularly when the stressor was appraised as more unpleasant. Daily‐life stressors were associated with momentary food craving. Individuals who generally perceived interpersonal stressors as their most stressful event tended to experience food cravings. Future research could further investigate the role of interpersonal stressors as a factor for overeating in daily life and the potential benefits of stress management in interventions.
“…That is, core symptoms refer to the increased amount of food intake and the fact that the consumption continues in spite of knowledge of adverse consequences. Both symptoms can be found in individuals that exhibit binge and emotional eating behaviours, both of which showed clear associations with stress (Fowler et al., 2022; Rosenbaum & White, 2015; van Strien, 2018). Furthermore, studies suggested that mindfulness‐based interventions can reduce both forms of disordered eating (Katterman et al., 2014).…”
There is an empirical association between stress and symptoms of food addiction (FA), but it is still not clear which domains of stress are the most relevant when it comes to FA, limiting the ability of researchers and practitioners to address problematic eating‐related health outcomes. In order to address this gap in the literature, we analysed how different domains of chronic stress are related to FA. We used data from a subsample of the LIFE‐Adult‐Study (N = 1172), a German cohort study. We conducted a linear regression analysis with stress domains (Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress, TICS) as predictors of FA (Yale Food Addiction Scale, YFAS). In the second regression analysis we included sociodemographic variables, personality, and smoking as control variables. There was a significant and positive association between Social Overload, Work Discontent, Excessive Demands from Work, and Chronic Worrying and FA. After adding control variables, only Social Overload, Excessive Demands from Work, and Chronic Worrying remained significant predictors. Connections between stress domains and FA can serve as starting points for the development of meaningful interventions that support individuals self‐care strategies (Social Overload), complexity management (Excessive Demands from Work), and coping with negative emotions (Chronic Worrying).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.