Between a rock and a hard place: Economic expansion and social responsibility in UK media discourses on the global alcohol industry

Abstract

Context Transnational alcohol corporations (TACs) employ a range of strategies to achieve their business objectives, including attempts to frame perceptions of their activities in media debates. TACs aim to achieve a favourable regulatory environment by presenting themselves as socially responsible actors. However, the need to secure financial investment means they must also emphasise their potential for growth. This article investigates tensions between these objectives in coverage of the global alcohol industry in the UK print media. Methods This article examines coverage of the world’s four largest TACs in five British daily newspapers and one industry publication between March 2012 and February 2013. 477 articles were identified for analysis through keyword searches of the LexisNexis database. Thematic coding of articles was conducted using Nvivo software. Findings Two conflicting framings of the alcohol industry emerge from our analysis. The first presents TACs as socially responsible actors; key partners to government in reducing alcohol-related harms. This is targeted at policy-makers and the public in an attempt to shape policy debates. The second framing highlights TACs’ potential for economic growth by establishing new markets and identifying new customer bases. This is targeted at an audience of potential investors. Conclusions A fundamental contradiction lies at the heart of these framings, reflecting the tensions that exist between TACs’ political and financial strategies. Alcohol industry involvement in policy-making thus involves a fundamental conflict of interests. Consequently, the UK government should reassess the prominence it currently affords to the industry in the development and delivery of alcohol policy.

Dark Nudges and Sludge in Big Alcohol: Behavioral Economics, Cognitive Biases, and Alcohol Industry Corporate Social Responsibility

“…Overall, our findings add to the literature on the contradictions that exist in the discourses of the AI, 79 whereby the industry claims that it is supporting public health and "Nudging for Good," 80,81 while simultaneously, through its CSR bodies, using dark nudges that are aligned with commercial rather than public health goals. Its key approach involves presenting health information, but subverting it with a range of dark nudges and sludge.…”

Reactions of industry and associated organisations to the announcement of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: longitudinal thematic analysis of UK media articles, 2016-18

“…Concerning the SDIL, a media analysis starting a year before the announcement of the policy suggested that articles supportive of SSB taxation (23.5%) outnumbered those that were oppositional (14.2%) [ 28 ] and that arguments underpinning proponents and opponents of the SDIL were broadly consistent with those used within the alcohol and tobacco industry [ 29 ]. While most of the research examining media representations of industry and their discursive strategies is focused on message framing [ 30 ], there is evidence that industry messaging can shift depending on the audience, with conflicting or contradictory debates and responses to regulation [ 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, examining industry reactions throughout policy development and implementation processes could offer novel insights into how industry messaging evolves in a changing political landscape over time.…”

Media Coverage of Alcohol Issues: A Critical Political Economy Framework—A Case Study from Ireland

“…However, this paper investigates how alcohol issues are covered in the news media by examining newspapers. It engages with the growing literature on this subject, which has investigated news media coverage of minimum pricing [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], alcohol use [ 9 ], the alcohol industry itself [ 10 ], alcohol policy and education [ 11 , 12 ], alcohol advertising [ 13 ], alcohol in ethnic and racial minority newspapers [ 14 ], as well as specific pieces of alcohol-related legislation [ 15 ].…”