2004
DOI: 10.1112/s0024610703004939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Betti Numbers of Semialgebraic and Sub-Pfaffian Sets

Abstract: Let X be a subset in [−1, 1] n 0 ⊂ R n 0 defined by a formulawhere Q i ∈ {∃, ∀}, Q i = Q i+1 , x i ∈ R n i , and Xν be either an open or a closed set in [−1, 1] n 0 +...+nν being a difference between a finite CW -complex and its subcomplex. We express an upper bound on each Betti number of X via a sum of Betti numbers of some sets defined by quantifier-free formulae involving Xν .In important particular cases of semialgebraic and semi-Pfaffian sets defined by quantifier-free formulae with polynomials and Pfaff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The case where Π| X is closed is treated in [14], and the proof is identical in the locally split case.…”
Section: Betti Numbers Of Sub-pfaffian Sets and Of Hausdorff Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The case where Π| X is closed is treated in [14], and the proof is identical in the locally split case.…”
Section: Betti Numbers Of Sub-pfaffian Sets and Of Hausdorff Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first upper-bounds for the Betti numbers of Pfaffian sets which were not defined by quantifier-free formulas were obtained in [14] (for sub-Pfaffian sets) and in [25] (for Hausdorff limits). These results will be the key to our estimates for relative closures.…”
Section: Betti Numbers Of Sub-pfaffian Sets and Of Hausdorff Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gabrielov, Vorobjov, and Zell (2003) showed how to compute bounds on the number of connected components of sets of the form (1). However, in their general approach it is often rather difficult to obtain good bounds because they, in fact, bound the sum of all Betti numbers Φ, while the number of connected components equals the zeroth Betti number.…”
Section: Pfaffian Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%