2009
DOI: 10.1348/096317908x285642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better than brainstorming? Potential contextual boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations

Abstract: Organizations and societies all need good, useful ideas to survive and prosper. People often enjoy brainstorming, though it is not as productive as they tend to believe. Groups can potentially generate more and better ideas when ‘brainwriting’; that is, silently sharing written ideas in a time‐ and sequence‐structured group format. This conceptual paper identifies likely boundary conditions to the promising findings from brainwriting laboratory research generalizing to real‐world organizational contexts. Impor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(133 reference statements)
1
76
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The participants were professionals from the field of management, simulation, calculations, process and product development, quality assurance and research. Brain writing is a silent, sharing, written creativity method and does not involve group discussion of written ideas during the idea-generation session [12].The brain writing method applied was the 6x3x5 method, which uses the principle: 6 participants writing down 3 ideas in 5 minutes. Each participant starts with writhing down three ideas on a sheet of paper before sending the paper on to person seated on his right-hand side.…”
Section: Case Company and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants were professionals from the field of management, simulation, calculations, process and product development, quality assurance and research. Brain writing is a silent, sharing, written creativity method and does not involve group discussion of written ideas during the idea-generation session [12].The brain writing method applied was the 6x3x5 method, which uses the principle: 6 participants writing down 3 ideas in 5 minutes. Each participant starts with writhing down three ideas on a sheet of paper before sending the paper on to person seated on his right-hand side.…”
Section: Case Company and Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our reasons for choosing these methods are specified below. Brainwriting is expected to improve fluency with respect to Osborn's standard brainstorming rules, for numerous reasons (Heslin, 2009): it prevents production blocking by forcing group members to communicate in written form, using different-coloured inks. This reduces the risks related to sharing ideas in a turn-based medium (e.g.…”
Section: Iv2 Choosing Relevant Methods For Cpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the findings of this study and ample research evidence (Coskun, 2005;Heslin, 2009;Kohn, Paulus, & Choi, 2011;Tsai, 2015) pointing to the fact that human behaviour, outcomes and achievements are directly influenced by their levels of creative and emotional learning competencies, it is thus recommended that schools, workplace, governmental bodies, research, training and academic institutions make it a point of duty to include creativity and emotional intelligence training programmes in their training curricular. These skills are essentials to handling anger, managing conflicts, developing empathy, and controlling impulses and ultimately fostering peace among faculty, work groups/teams and community members.…”
Section: Vmentioning
confidence: 96%