“…Students could state why they supported or opposed certain perspectives, indicating their ability to argue and make decisions based on reasoned evaluation. The general exploitation of CT skills by learners supports the statement of Mills (1998, p. 21), ‘Provocative techniques directed towards the class force students to examine the grounds of their assumptions, which leads them to the formulation of solid, rational arguments and conclusions with logical foundations’. After listening to conflicting viewpoints, each group presented their consensus to the whole class, thus learning how to make active interpretation, examine their ideas for possible bias, and put forth clear and logical arguments to support their opinions in the face of strong opposition.Table 3 reveals significant growth of learner exploitation in five categories of CT abilities during the 10‐week experiment in pair‐ t test between early (the first 5 weeks) and late sessions (the last 5 weeks), indicating interpretation ( t = 9.57, p <.001), inference ( t = 6.16, p <.001), recognition of assumptions ( t = 9.00, p <.001), deduction ( t = 12.37, p <.001), as well as evaluation ( t = 6.97, p <.001).…”