Better support for children with additional health and developmental needs in school settings: Perspectives of education experts

Abstract

Aim Many children start school with additional health and developmental needs (AHDN), yet how best to support these children for optimal outcomes in the school setting is a complex challenge. This study aims to determine the views of education experts on what differentiates the most effective primary schools. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with nine senior leaders across the education system responsible for managing or improving practice across a range of schools or school regions in Victoria. Using a positive deviance approach, which investigates strategies already implemented in organizations achieving desired outcomes, the semi‐structured interviews aimed to elicit instances of perceived good practice that already exists within the school system. Interviews were analysed using inductive content analysis. Results All education experts reported high variability across schools and suggested a number of factors differentiating those that were most effective at supporting children with AHDN. They included the presence of strong teacher support by the school leadership team; explicit and documented processes to guide the practice of teachers and ensure consistency at a whole school level; inclusive relationships and environments; participation and knowledge sharing between medical, allied health and other stakeholders in the care team; and an evidenced‐based approach to allocating resources to programmes and strategies. Conclusion This exploration of instances of good practice can generate novel insights into a complex problem. Current findings suggest a number of potential opportunities for enhancing practice that can be tested in future research. Improving outcomes for this vulnerable and significant group of children will require collaboration across health and education.

Supporting children’s mental health in primary schools: a qualitative exploration of educator perspectives

“…This meant that 12 schools, each with multiple participants, were withdrawn from the study. However, 17 participants is a suitable sample size for the study design and is comparable with other studies (Garvey et al, 2020 ; Shelemy et al, 2019 ).…”

Examining the Educational Gap for Children with ADHD and Subthreshold ADHD

“…However, the Australian National Consistent Collection of Data (NCCD) is beginning to address this gap by having schools examine the type of adjustments that they make in the classroom for students based on student’s functional needs, as opposed to clinical diagnosis criteria. Some Australian states are also using this model to determine school funding, potentially enabling a closer match between student needs and school resources (Garvey et al, 2020).…”

Interactions between special education teachers and children with chronic complex conditions: A qualitative study

“…In Japan, efforts to accumulate professional experience and improve self-efficacy are urgently needed in special education for sick children, as teachers currently have limited experience in this field (Nagae, 2016;Takeda & Kasahara, 2001). In addition to general training for health disorders, specific training is required for some conditions, including rare genetic diseases and those associated with severe functional limitations (Garvey et al, 2020).…”