Better Sorry than Safe: Emotional Discourses and Neo-normative Control in a Workplace Safety Council

Abstract

Recent organizational theorizing has noted the emergence of a new spirit of normative control; implicit, informal, and internalized, “neo-normative” control emphasizes a positive affective disposition toward work, a happy, fun, and inclusive workplace where employees are encouraged to “be themselves”. This emphasis on positivity, however, is often accompanied by diffuse and persistent anxiety, fear, and other forms of subjective suffering often noted in studies of neo-normative control. The relation between purportedly positive neo-normative discourses of engagement and the persistent resurgence of subjective suffering remains under-theorized and holds wider implications for understanding the control regime represented by neo-normative control and its possible modes of contestation. Through a qualitative case study of a changing organizational safety program at a university facilities service, we examine how engagement and fear discourses worked together at different phases of the program to create both ambient anxiety and self-engagement solutions to manage that anxiety. Rather than conceptualizing suffering as the unintended consequence or ignored remainder of neo-normative “positive” messages, we describe how fear appeals explicitly invoke suffering to enrol employees into a self-shifting mode that leads them to be proactive. In our discussion, we theorize the co-constitutive aspects of positive and negative emotional discourses within a control-capturing process, developing the implications of this dual-affective orientation for understanding neo-normative control and its self-fulfilling properties at work in the neoliberal workplace.

Corrosion beneath the surface? The emotional navigation of managerialist regulation in German welfare organizations

“…, 2000) – are often understood as “soft power” which makes organizations work (Aromaa et al. , 2020), even as the latter frequently embark on the “fabrication of emotion repertoires” (Neckel and Sauerborn, 2023, p. 35), including with the intention to motivate members (Mielly et al. , 2023).…”

“…The multi-faceted role of emotions is also acknowledged by work within the field of organization studies (Fineman, 2010;Zietsma et al, 2019). In this field, feelingswhether emerging from below or triggered by superiors (for the latter, see Ashkanasy et al, 2000) are often understood as "soft power" which makes organizations work (Aromaa et al, 2020), even as the latter frequently embark on the "fabrication of emotion repertoires" (Neckel and Sauerborn, 2023, p. 35), including with the intention to motivate members (Mielly et al, 2023). In the respective scholarship, a focus lies on emotion-related demands in work processes, with Hochschild's concept of "emotional labour" being an important reference point (Hochschild, 2012).…”

The Impact of Social Working Environment and Secured Working Environment on Job Satisfaction in the Lebanese Small Business Context: The Mediating Effect of Trust

“…According to research by (Mielly et al, 2022), a social working environment with coworkers and supervisors positively affects job satisfaction among healthcare workers. Using a sample of 300 healthcare workers, the data were analyzed using regression analysis.…”