2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2635326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better Methods for Delivering Adaptive Regulation in Public Management: An Application to the NDIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For traumatised children, treatment acceptability also encompasses their parent's perceptions of that treatment, with researchers highlighting the role that parents play in initially accessing treatment and in adhering to treatment protocols (Wamser‐Nanney & Steinzor, ). Lay person/parental perceptions of treatment acceptability is particularly topical in Australia, where current changes in federal funding arrangements have given consumers an unprecedented amount of influence over treatment planning (Carey & Mathews, ). The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS, http://www.ndis.gov.au) represents a fundamental shift towards a consumer driven model of funding, where clients rather than clinicians will decide on the direction of government intervention spending (Thill, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For traumatised children, treatment acceptability also encompasses their parent's perceptions of that treatment, with researchers highlighting the role that parents play in initially accessing treatment and in adhering to treatment protocols (Wamser‐Nanney & Steinzor, ). Lay person/parental perceptions of treatment acceptability is particularly topical in Australia, where current changes in federal funding arrangements have given consumers an unprecedented amount of influence over treatment planning (Carey & Mathews, ). The introduction of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS, http://www.ndis.gov.au) represents a fundamental shift towards a consumer driven model of funding, where clients rather than clinicians will decide on the direction of government intervention spending (Thill, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%