Abstract:ObjectiveEvidence-based clinical resources (EBCRs) have the potential to improve diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy. The majority of US teaching medical institutions have incorporated them into clinical training. Many EBCRs are subscription based, and their cost is prohibitive for most clinicians and trainees in low-income and middle-income countries. We sought to determine the utility of EBCRs in an East African medical school.SettingThe University of Rwanda (UR), a medical school located in East Africa.Part… Show more
“…Though medical students in the US are likely to be introduced to these digital tools early in their career 6 , the use of digital tools has not gained the same momentum in sub-Saharan African medical education 7 . Research conducted by the authors of this study at the University of Rwanda suggests that early introduction of an evidence-based tool to medical students leads to habit formation and use of the tool in later clinical practice 8 . However, there has been limited research on this topic, likely due to limited access to such tools whose cost can be prohibitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital – works to facilitate access to evidence-based clinical resources to health providers serving vulnerable populations who couldn't otherwise afford them. A pilot study run by Better Evidence demonstrated the utility of Up-To-Date among medical students at University of Rwanda 8 , the group began facilitating donated institutional licenses to medical schools across Africa as part of the Better Evidence for training program. Access was granted to MakCHS in 2019, with plans to add new schools annually.…”
Background: The use of point-of-care, evidence-based tools is becoming increasingly popular. They can provide easy-to- use, high-quality information which is regularly updated and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Integrating such tools into clinical practice is an important component of improving the quality of health care. However, because such tools are rarely used in resource-limited settings, there is limited research on uptake especially among medical students.
Objective: This paper explores the uptake of one such tool, Up-To-Date, when provided free of cost at a medical school in Africa.
Methods: In partnership with the Better Evidence at Ariadne Labs free access to UpToDate was granted through the MakCHS IP address. On-site librarians facilitated training sessions and spread awareness of the tool. Usage data was aggre- gated, based on log ins and content views, presented and analyzed using Excel tables and graphs.
Results: The data shows evidence of meaningful usage, with 43,043 log ins and 15,591 registrations between August 2019 and August 2020. The most common topics viewed were in obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, drug information, and infectious diseases. Access occurred mainly through the mobile phone app.
Conclusion: Findings show usage by various user categories, but with inconsistent uptake and low usage. Librarians can draw upon these results to encourage institutions to support uptake of point-of-care tools in clinical practice.
Keywords: UpToDate clinical decision support tool; Makerere University College of Health Sciences; Uganda.
“…Though medical students in the US are likely to be introduced to these digital tools early in their career 6 , the use of digital tools has not gained the same momentum in sub-Saharan African medical education 7 . Research conducted by the authors of this study at the University of Rwanda suggests that early introduction of an evidence-based tool to medical students leads to habit formation and use of the tool in later clinical practice 8 . However, there has been limited research on this topic, likely due to limited access to such tools whose cost can be prohibitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women's Hospital – works to facilitate access to evidence-based clinical resources to health providers serving vulnerable populations who couldn't otherwise afford them. A pilot study run by Better Evidence demonstrated the utility of Up-To-Date among medical students at University of Rwanda 8 , the group began facilitating donated institutional licenses to medical schools across Africa as part of the Better Evidence for training program. Access was granted to MakCHS in 2019, with plans to add new schools annually.…”
Background: The use of point-of-care, evidence-based tools is becoming increasingly popular. They can provide easy-to- use, high-quality information which is regularly updated and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes. Integrating such tools into clinical practice is an important component of improving the quality of health care. However, because such tools are rarely used in resource-limited settings, there is limited research on uptake especially among medical students.
Objective: This paper explores the uptake of one such tool, Up-To-Date, when provided free of cost at a medical school in Africa.
Methods: In partnership with the Better Evidence at Ariadne Labs free access to UpToDate was granted through the MakCHS IP address. On-site librarians facilitated training sessions and spread awareness of the tool. Usage data was aggre- gated, based on log ins and content views, presented and analyzed using Excel tables and graphs.
Results: The data shows evidence of meaningful usage, with 43,043 log ins and 15,591 registrations between August 2019 and August 2020. The most common topics viewed were in obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, drug information, and infectious diseases. Access occurred mainly through the mobile phone app.
Conclusion: Findings show usage by various user categories, but with inconsistent uptake and low usage. Librarians can draw upon these results to encourage institutions to support uptake of point-of-care tools in clinical practice.
Keywords: UpToDate clinical decision support tool; Makerere University College of Health Sciences; Uganda.
“…There is often a difference in the health policy of LMICs between the government’s perceived priorities and what the population wants [32]. Guidelines have helped the standardisation of care and improved standards in many HICs [33], but have been shown to negatively influence their uptake in situations different from where the data were derived [34]. This difficulty in characterisation of disease prevalence between LMICs and HICs means that the utility of urological guidelines, outside the environment they were formulated in becomes a significant issue.…”
Section: Appropriatenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for their development does exist as there are several associations that could constitute member committees to formulate them and initiate data collation; the Pan‐African Association of Urology, The South African Urology Association, Urological Association of Zambia, and the Egyptian Urological Association all have this capacity. If they developed context‐based, local and regional guidelines, available from a freely available open‐access source [34], an increased uptake of locally relevant data would possibly encourage the provision of a more evidence‐based practice [34, 35].…”
Delivering urological humanitarian aid to countries with greater need has been provided by urologists associated with British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) Urolink over the last 30 years. Urolink has realised the need to understand where that need is geographically, what tangible help is required, and how assistance can be delivered in the most ethically appropriate way. The World Bank stratification of countries by per capita gross national income has helped in the identification of low‐come countries or lower‐middle‐income countries (LMICs), the vast majority of which are in sub‐Saharan Africa. The medical and socioeconomic needs of those country’s populations, which constitute 17% of the global community, are substantially different from that required in higher income countries. More than 40% of sub‐Saharan Africa’s population is aged <14 years, it has a substantially reduced life expectancy, which influences the type of pathologies seen, and perinatal complications are a major cause of morbidity for both mother and child. There is a significant problem with the availability of medical care in these countries and almost a third of global deaths have been attributed to the lack of access to emergency and elective surgery. Urologically, the main conditions demanding the attention of the very few available urologists are congenital anomalies, benign prostatic hypertrophy, urolithiasis, urethral stricture, and pelvic cancer. The management of these conditions is often substantially different from that in the UK, being limited by a lack of personnel, equipment, and access to geographically relevant guidelines appropriate to the healthcare environment. Assisting LMICs to develop sustainable urological services can be helped by understanding the local needs of linked institutions, establishing trusting and durable relationships with partner centres and by providing appropriate education that can be perpetuated, and disseminated, across a region of need.
“…Therefore, during the 2015-2016 year, the educational committee organized a new intervention FD module emphasizing leadership. Case-control studies sometimes use historical controls, if controls are not permitted, based on special conditions such as the learning right of participants and educational ethics [22,23]. Therefore,, historical regular FD cohorts were used in this study between 2013 and 2016 as controls for the intervention FD cohorts.…”
Section: Background To the Development Of The New Leadershipenhanced mentioning
Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies (CC) in general medicine-based primary care are essential for junior medical trainees. In this country, a regular faculty development (FD) program aimed at training faculty in instructing (teaching and assessing) these CC had operated. However, leadership was not emphasized. In a new intervention module, the roles and associated responsibilities of clinical instructors to conduct, design, and lead CC-based education were emphasis.Aims: This follow-up explanatory case study compares the effectiveness of intervention module with that of the previous regular module.
Methods:The regular group (n = 28) comprised clinical instructors who participated in the FD module during the 2013-2014 year while the intervention group (n = 28) was composed of 2015-2016 participants. Prior to the formal (hands-on) training, participants in the intervention group were asked to study the online materials of the regular module. These participants then received a 30-h hands-on training in conducting, designing, and leading skills. Finally, they prepared a 10-h reflective end-of-module presentation of their real-world practices.(Continued on next page)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.