2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better assessment of the distribution of As and Pb in soils in a former smelting area, using ordinary co-kriging and sequential Gaussian co-simulation of portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) and ICP-AES data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The high values of Pb (Figure 3c,d) and Cd (Figure 3e,f) were mainly located in the southeast and northwest parts of the study area, while the high values of As (Figure 3g,h) were found in the north and south portions. The spatial patterns of heavy metals pollution produced by OK and COK were very similar, but COK captured more local variations, further confirming the advantage of COK over OK and that use of covariates in COK could provide more detailed information [28,49]. These results confirmed the conclusions of a previous study [22] that the application of XRF measurements as covariates could improve the spatial interpolation of soil heavy metals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high values of Pb (Figure 3c,d) and Cd (Figure 3e,f) were mainly located in the southeast and northwest parts of the study area, while the high values of As (Figure 3g,h) were found in the north and south portions. The spatial patterns of heavy metals pollution produced by OK and COK were very similar, but COK captured more local variations, further confirming the advantage of COK over OK and that use of covariates in COK could provide more detailed information [28,49]. These results confirmed the conclusions of a previous study [22] that the application of XRF measurements as covariates could improve the spatial interpolation of soil heavy metals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, few studies of the use of PXRF data as covariates during mapping of soil heavy metals have been conducted to date. Kim et al [28] used PXRF measurement as covariates during analysis of the spatial distribution of As and Pb in soils in a former smelting area in South Korea and found that PXRF could reduce the effort required for collection of soil samples for conventional analysis and improve spatial estimations of polluted areas. However, to the best of our knowledge, few studies have used data from PXRF measurements as covariates to estimate spatial distributions of Cr, Pb, Cd, As and Ni in soil with COK to date [23,26,27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are also less used in scientific works, which in addition to the techniques previously discussed, use techniques that involve fluorescence, microwave induced plasma, electron capture detector and X-ray in diverse matrices. In soil samples, Pierangeli et al (2015) used TXRF and obtained 33.3 μg L -1 , Zhong et al (2019) with gas chromatograph with an electron capture detector (GC ECD) found 480 µg kg -1 and Kim et al (2019) with PXRF reported 1,670 µg kg -1 . Analyzing samples in fish, Gallego Ríos et al (2018) obtained 76.7 µg kg -1 using MIP OES and in samples of Eisenia fetida, Wang et al (2016) obtained 200 µg kg -1 with HG AFS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6, n. 14, p. 803-817. Oliveira et al, 2016;Souza et al, 2016;Pereira et al, 2016), hydride generation combined with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry HG ICP OES (Kim et al, 2019), hydride generation combined with atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HG AFS) (Wang et al, 2016), microwave induced plasma optical emission spectrometry (MIP OES) (Gallego Ríos et al, 2018), visible ultraviolet spectroscopy (UV VIS) (Gürkan et al, 2015), total reflection X-ray fluorescence (TXRF) (Pierangeli et al, 2015) and portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) (García-Rico et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages of p-XRF could potentially enhance the spatial prediction of soil PTEs, with some attempts previously reported. For example, in a study conducted in a former smelting area, Kim et al (2019) [56] proved that using p-XRF measurements as an auxiliary for COK improved the estimation of the PTE spatial distribution even with a smaller sample size. In another study, Xia et al (2019) [57] reported that using p-XRF measurements as covariates in COK improved the PTE mapping accuracy in agricultural soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%