The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2022
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2021.3121695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better Approximation for Distributed Weighted Vertex Cover via Game-Theoretic Learning

Abstract: Toward better approximation for the minimumweighted vertex cover (MWVC) problem in multiagent systems, we present a distributed algorithm from the perspective of learning in games. For self-organized coordination and optimization, we see each vertex as a potential game player who makes decisions using local information of its own and the immediate neighbors. The resulting Nash equilibrium is classified into two categories, i.e., the inferior Nash equilibrium (INE) and the dominant Nash equilibrium (DNE). We sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm in this article can be allied to model some industrial process systems. [117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed algorithm in this article can be allied to model some industrial process systems. [117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126][127]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the presented methods have been verified by the simulation, and the accuracy of parameter estimation can be improved by using hierarchical identification principle. The proposed algorithm in this article can be allied to model some industrial process systems 117‐127 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the optimal cover contains at least one of the two vertices of any edge, i.e., any one covering set of a given graph will be at most twice as large (in power) as the optimal covering set for that graph [30]. There are also algorithmic techniques where the coefficient of approximation to the optimal solution is smaller [31,32].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%