2002
DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2002.121162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Better anticoagulation control improves survival after valve replacement

Abstract: High anticoagulation variability is the most important independent predictor of reduced survival after valve replacement with a mechanical valve. Better anticoagulation control should improve survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
70
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, due to the lower and slower flows across the atrioventricular valves, it is established practice to anti-coagulate mechanical mitral and tricuspid valves to a greater degree than aortic and pulmonic valves. Data support this practice (Butchart et al, 2002;Ezekowitz, 2002). This requirement of anticoagulation is the primary disadvantage of mechanical valve prostheses, as they are more durable than allograft or xenograft prostheses.…”
Section: Valvular Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Additionally, due to the lower and slower flows across the atrioventricular valves, it is established practice to anti-coagulate mechanical mitral and tricuspid valves to a greater degree than aortic and pulmonic valves. Data support this practice (Butchart et al, 2002;Ezekowitz, 2002). This requirement of anticoagulation is the primary disadvantage of mechanical valve prostheses, as they are more durable than allograft or xenograft prostheses.…”
Section: Valvular Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…2,13,22,23 Lower INRs may decrease bleeding, 10,16,17,19,34 while unstable anticoagulation predicts valve-related events. 33,35,36 In the present study, INR variability (ie, INR SD) tended to univariately predict TE risk and independently predict bleeding. 35,36 Thus, reducing INR variability is a stronger objective than INR level after MVR.…”
Section: Anticoagulation Effectmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our population-based study allowed complete collection of INRs with higher documentation than most attentive observational studies 14,33 and comparable to prospective clinical trials. 3,10,21 Moreover, anticoagulation is analyzed not as intention to treat but as achieved INRs.…”
Section: Anticoagulation Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Butchart et al [29] followed a cohort study where they collected 82,297 blood samples for obtaining the international normalized ratio (INR) of 1,476 patients who underwent surgery for valve replacement by mechanical prostheses between 1979 and 1994 and were followed up until 1998, noting that the high anticoagulation variability is the most important independent predictor of survival. The variability of anticoagulation was expressed for each patient, the percentage of INR values †outside the limits between 2.0 and 4.0.…”
Section: Fig 3 -Kaplan-meier Time To Assess Event-free Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%