2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.73.125021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bethe-Salpeter approach for relativistic positronium in a strong magnetic field

Abstract: We study the electron-positron system in a strong magnetic field using the differential BetheSalpeter equation in the ladder approximation. We derive the fully relativistic two-dimensional form that the four-dimensional Bethe-Salpeter equation takes in the limit of asymptotically strong constant and homogeneous magnetic field. An ultimate value for the magnetic field is determined, which provides the full compensation of the positronium rest mass by the binding energy in the maximum symmetry state and vanishin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…therein). Similar in essence effects are expected to come out also both in 2+1 D (planar graphene-based hetero-structures [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]) and in 1+1 D (one-dimensional "hydrogen ion" [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…therein). Similar in essence effects are expected to come out also both in 2+1 D (planar graphene-based hetero-structures [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]) and in 1+1 D (one-dimensional "hydrogen ion" [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…where U ρ,σ (x),Û ρ,σ (x) = M ρ,σ (x) or W ρ,σ (x), the prime stands for the derivative with respect to the argument, and the explicit form of TrG mj (r, r; iy), which is given in (24), one obtains R1 0 r dr TrG mj (r, r; iy)…”
Section: Appendix A: the Uehling Potential In 2+1 Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going beyond the LLL approximation is an ambitious task (see, e.g. (Shabad & Usov, 2006)) which will be left as a subject of our future research.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%