1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0375-9474(98)00172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beta decay of 31Ar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
53
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30], with the new high-precision 31 Cl mass excess, a fit of the quadratic IMME fails, requiring a large coefficient for the cubic term, d = −3.5(11) keV. Using our value of 6279.0(6) keV for the observed IAS excitation energy, the quadratic fit also fails, requiring a coefficient for the cubic term of d = −4.3 (11) keV.…”
Section: Immementioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[30], with the new high-precision 31 Cl mass excess, a fit of the quadratic IMME fails, requiring a large coefficient for the cubic term, d = −3.5(11) keV. Using our value of 6279.0(6) keV for the observed IAS excitation energy, the quadratic fit also fails, requiring a coefficient for the cubic term of d = −4.3 (11) keV.…”
Section: Immementioning
confidence: 81%
“…[30] and the other, precisely known values for 31 Si and 31 P [43]. However, this does little to fix the breakdown problem: the reduced chisquared value of the quadratic fit actually increases from χ 2 /ν = 11.6, in Ref.…”
Section: Immementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations